Trumps attack on Iran - 2026 edition

How will the upcoming attack on Iran go.

  • Total voters
    21
SPLINE said:
Aye, much better to have an anti-British tyrant in, eh Justin?

Usual islam propaganda - there is always a school, hospital or baby milk powder factory bombing story trotted out.
Click to expand...
You need to drink less urine, it's clouding your judgement.
 
I predict that the surge in oil prices will give nutcase sillyband the excuse to roll back on the stupid net zero that labour has talked themself into..
 
I also predict King Charles to be suddenly "unwell" and so will not be able to go and visit Trump next month over the current spat and starmers fence sitting "sending help after the war is won". Cue the BBC with endless propaganda reports about worries for the Kings health - as he returns home and lays low for a few days.
 
aveatry said:
I also predict King Charles to be suddenly "unwell" and so will not be able to go and visit Trump next month over the current spat and starmers fence sitting "sending help after the war is won". Cue the BBC with endless propaganda reports about worries for the Kings health - as he returns home and lays low for a few days.
Click to expand...
I don't see how not letting the US use UK military bases for launching illegal military attacks on Iran, but changing that stance after Iran attacked UK allies, is sitting on the fence.
 
Doubt this newly elected head mad muller will be around long Trump don’t like him

Life expectancy couple weeks ????? May be
 
transam said:
Doubt this newly elected head mad muller will be around long Trump don’t like him

Life expectancy couple weeks ????? May be
Click to expand...
The other day trump said they killed the mullah and they think they know the next one and they will kill him - and they have a good idea who his replacement one will be and he will be killed and pretty soon we wont know any-more o_O
Anyone taking the job right now is just desperate for 70 white virgins
 
warey4life said:
I don't see how not letting the US use UK military bases for launching illegal military attacks on Iran, but changing that stance after Iran attacked UK allies, is sitting on the fence.
Click to expand...

Starmer's played a blinder once again. The public are with him 92% over Iran and his decision to not get involved in the main event.
 
MNW67 said:
Starmer's played a blinder once again. The public are with him 92% over Iran and his decision to not get involved in the main event.
Click to expand...
"The public" :rolleyes: you are missin the the bleedin obvious - the "public" matters not -- its the home grown islamic extremist already here that he was trying to appease but all he has done is give the UK intelligent services 7 extra days to try protect us as those extremest dont care if at first starmer delayed attacking their "brothers and sisters" - he still did.
 
aveatry said:
"The public" :rolleyes: you are missin the the bleedin obvious - the "public" matters not -- its the home grown islamic extremist already here that he was trying to appease but all he has done is give the UK intelligent services 7 extra days to try protect us as those extremest dont care if at first starmer delayed attacking their "brothers and sisters" - he still did.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • giphy (1).gif
    giphy (1).gif
    684.7 KB · Views: 19
Prickard --- What is your problem with that statement it is totally based on fact - all muslims consider themselves brothers and sisters - it is how they describe themselves in front of each other. - Tell me you live in a little white village without telling me you live in a little white village . - I dont and I listen a lot to BBC "asian radio" and how they reference each other - the fact that starmer delayed the UKs responce will not save us from islamic attacks.
It would also explain some posters anti jewish/ pro islam views on here - they are either muslims themselves or have family members who are
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top