Binface put up a fight….

What is your problem with that statistic
Antarctica is 4900% larger than us! They're not doing anything! Why should we bother!?

Using surface area as a metric to compare the amount of effort being spent to deploy green technology is asinine.

Also your number is wrong, China is 39 times our land mass, or 3800% larger.

And even if we did use your stupid irrelevant number if you translate the amount of capacity added into percentages they added 8780% more than we did. So by land mass they're still doing twice as much.

All told, stupid. So in short you earnt a :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Antarctica is 4900% larger than us! They're not doing anything! Why should we bother!?

Using surface area as a metric to compare the amount of effort being spent to deploy green technology is asinine.

Also your number is wrong, China is 39 times our land mass, or 3800% larger.

And even if we did use your stupid irrelevant number if you translate the amount of capacity added into percentages they added 8780% more than we did. So by land mass they're still doing twice as much.

All told, stupid. So in short you earnt a :rolleyes:
You cant bare to be schooled can you, first it was GISP then it was flight radar and now its China :LOL:
3,839% larger
 
Back
Top