Search results

What being above getting convicted by made up charges in a foreign kangaroo court

So you still haven’t read the story. The trial was a kangeroo court Even Robert Buckland, a Tory says she hasn’t received even basic rights in the trial. The 2 year sentence is a nonsense. The real story is that she was a present at a signing of a deal with Putin and her aunt…..if you want...

Silly boy Leaking the budget was a serious breach, it was inevitable a head was gonna roll

The OBR have consistently got their forecasts widely wrong Also other forecasters indicated a bigger black hole than she stated. I don’t recall you making a big fuss about Truss not bothering to get any analysis done and spooling the markets. I just shows you are a tribal Tory

no she isnt Sept 2025 Reeves rejects claims of £50bn 'black hole' in finances https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx27nm2mn5po

As I predicted the useless Gullis joins the Tory 2.0 party He is a nasty grifter….a Tory entryist who joined Tories in 2019 when Johnson needed liars to support the Brexit con. So now Reform have Anderson, Dorries, Gullis

You keep saying he was sacked…..twice in the last hour or so

But he was demoted, not sacked….as I’ve stated numerous times. You keep claiming he was sacked…..which comes back to arguing against facts

I think he should’ve been offered more training It sounds like he was a great firefighter but a not very good manager, who was unable to provide leadership to staff.

So you think he should’ve been allowed to keep his management position which meant the bullying carrying on.

you are disagreeing with facts such a person is a fool Do you think workplace bullying and intimidation is acceptable? do you think staff have a right to report it if they suffer that?

its got nothing to do with me, you are choosing to not agree with facts You can choose to not agree with facts.............it is your freedom to be a fool

they are simply the facts of the case the points in question have nothing to do with the tribunal FACT 1 you claimed that Simon Bailey was sacked, he was not FACT 2 you claimed that Simon Bailey was sacked because he did not stop use of the word "fireman" the case was about bullying not...

Instead of getting annoyed please focus your energy in learning how to research properly................otherwise you will keep on being wrong

So you dont agree with facts...........oh dear You have been posting falsehoods You said he was sacked for not stopping staff using the word fireman neither of those things are true

he was given a demotion

so the fire service has to tolerate intimidation and bullying because nobody is allowed to tell managers they need to deal with it in case they get stressed Geez you do talk a pile of poo

Pete says: I wont ever agree to the facts they did they gave him warnings, a disciplinary and when he did nothing they gave him a final warning transferred him to an office job the fire service did not sack him what part of that do you think is unfair??

but that is exactly what happened he was transferred to an office role he was not sacked also he was given previous warnings and disciplinary

here you are again pushing lies -are you going to acknowledge that fact? the case was about workplace bullying culture "It found she had been subjected to “persistent” derogatory and offensive comments from two managers at the service, and she told the tribunal that the workplace culture at...