Search results

He's making it difficult for the billionaires to sell from their china factories. He's not good for billionaires.

Errrh, britain does same, buying up ukrainian assets at fire sale prices. A good leader should do that, don't you think?

I am looking at a slow fuel tank air leak due to corrosion of the filler neck around the cap area. This caused the petrol to evaporate over the course of a few months. So far this hasn't caused anything to light up on the dash. According to some reports on the internet, the corrosion is an MOT...

Absolutely not. He's an americans first president. That means what goes on in europe is none of his business. He's a good president for the people of his country.

How do you know? Do I trust you, bro?

Here's the production version of the charge controller, based on the step up down DC converter I was using before. I have 3 units, 2 for in car use. Use of ethernet wires limits the maximum capability to 2 amps. For the in car units, these are protected by 250mA fuses on the supply and output sides.

They are involved. They are sitting at the special kiddies table on the side in the proceedings.

The portable charger is viable. By deep cycling the charger battery, I may be able to get 1 month or more of unattended charging/tendering time out of it. The minimum voltage the controller needs is 4.8V. This allows extraction of all available power from the charger battery. FEB-05 charger...

It is a far away land. I couldn't point it out on a map if you were to test me. I did know a ukrainian, he did work on my flat. Along with his polish masters, they were a bunch of criminals. I am sure you will understand my sentiments of fighting until the last ukrainian.

The talks are about a deal to keep kursk. You are not getting your analogy right.

I would support this ^^^^ guy to invade russia 150%. If he wins, we will all get free oil, gas, food for a few hundred years. How do I vote for it?

That's because you are not looking at it strategically. Is the west under military threat? No, even if it had no troops, it is still under no threat. The problem is what happened to the money saved? In america, at least, the money has gone into private hands. In europe, some of the money has...

There is no riddle. Ukraine did it, so what? Russia did it, so what? US did it, so what? UK did it, so what? The last time the whole thing blew up. It was in the news for a week or two. Then nothing happened. If it blows up again, what difference does it make?

The point is, it doesn't matter who did it. It has no consequences.

Looks like a real flag to me - I can see a real hole on the roof. Bidden was ready to fight nuclear war with russia, no doubt with 150% british support. That wasn't reckless. Why would this be.

Is that good or bad? If they blow up your power station, does that power you up to defeat them?

Who did america get syria for? Did the chosen people abandon syria, or are they very excited about syria? Iran faces the same fate, and russia isn't its friend, it stands alone. You obviously don't understand the meaning of strategic. Strategic systems are not sold.

There is no selling. American national interest traded bits of ukraine for syria. It was a good deal. American national interest will look even better if it then further trades the russian gains for their acceptance of nato strategic missile systems in eastern europe.

A chosen one said I was indian, though.

That's pennywise and pound foolish. After destroying the tank, the ukrainains promptly loses the land the tank was sitting on. The russians then dig up more metal from the captured land to make more tanks.