“Christ is king”

Not exact locations but UK will do - until then its noted by everyone that you are a foreign agitator. And an abusive one at that.
And it's noted by everyone that you try to insist we disclose our location to suit your hypotheses, so that you can weaponise it.
Like this:
Tell me you live in a little white village without telling me you live in a little white village .
Even then he won't really care because he has no children and lives in a little white village in a £1+ house far away from the crapp he wants to force onto everyone else
living in his little (quint essential) as described by it's inhabitants, white village. With no houses under £1m.
And many more.

You have no authority, nor any moral reason to request we respond to your demands. If we did you would be ever increasing your demands, and your weaponising of our location.
So jog on, lying eejit.
 
Post a DIYnot link to the post in which he's included it.

I asked you why did you report the most recent article posted by Odds?
 
take it up with odds, I am not discussing this with you, you cannot read obviously.
You don't know why you reported it?
Do you often report posts without any reason?
And obviously I just read your post, so your final deduction is utter nonsense. :rolleyes:
 
You don't know why you reported it?
Do you often report posts without any reason?
And obviously I just read your post, so your final deduction is utter nonsense. :rolleyes:
Not my post, its odds post, is it ok now then? You know that link that doesnt exist on his latest post,
 
And it's noted by everyone that you try to insist we disclose our location to suit your hypotheses, so that you can weaponise it.
Like this:
And many more.
You have no authority, nor any moral reason to request we respond to your demands. If we did you would be ever increasing your demands, and your weaponising of our location.
So jog on, lying eejit.
No we --- just you, morq lives in the UK. You dont - that much is clear
 
And it's noted by everyone that you try to insist we disclose our location to suit your hypotheses, so that you can weaponise it.
Like this:
Its funny how you pick those out from a prearticular poster that disappeared at the very same time the YOU appeared- :unsure:
 
Link from Odds post that he himself has posted.
The above article that you posted has no relevance to Odds most recent precented article, indicated below.
You claimed that the top article was posted by Odds, so please stop squirming like a trapped snake and provide the link to Odds post where he presented that top article, which you claimed he did.
 
Can fairy stories be incompatible, if they're fairy stories?
They would have to go something like this:
Jack and Jill went up the hill........
Or
Jack and Jill didn't go up the hill.......

But as they're fairy stories, they might not be referring to the same Jack, or Jill, or the same hill, because everything in the fairy stories is fantasy.
Exactly all fantasy .
 
Its funny how you pick those out from a prearticular poster that disappeared at the very same time the YOU appeared- :unsure:
They're easily available with a search. :rolleyes:
I wasn't bothered about the date, the proof that you want to weaponise our location was sufficient.
And they prove that you do want to weaponise our location, so only a fool would disclose their location for you to weaponise. And I'm not that fool.
Jog on, lying eejit.
 
The above article that you posted has no relevance to Odds most recent precented article, indicated below.

You claimed that the top article was posted by Odds, so please stop squirming like a trapped snake and provide the link to Odds post where he presented that top article, which you claimed he did.
I am not getting into your pathetic little game of ping pong of umpteen pages of you trying to prove points whilst losing drastically. I have posted his link, if you dont like it take it up with the man that posted it. I am way too good to engage with little people over it.
 
I am not getting into your pathetic little game of ping pong of umpteen pages of you trying to prove points whilst losing drastically. I have posted his link, if you dont like it take it up with the man that posted it. I am way too good to engage with little people over it.
You have provided a link to an article that you claimed was posted by Odds. see below
Link from Odds post that he himself has posted.
But when challenged to prove it was posted by Odds, you've failed miserably, and instead you've squirmed like a trapped snake.
 
Back
Top