We are having a bathroom refurb and I want to have a humidistat controlled in-line fan in the loft. I also want a separate switch that allows the fan to be manually turned on if required, so bypassing the humidistat control. Is this possible?
(We don't want the fan to be connected to the light switch in any way.)
I was planning on this fan: https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/SLTD250SILENTslashT.html
As it has a run on timer built in that could be useful to use within the system.
I was initially planning on getting this remote humidistat: https://mselectronics.co.uk/product/remote-bathroom-fan-humidity-control/
But the manufacturer has just told me they are having component supply issues, so there wont be any for at least 2 months.
So I have switched to this one: https://www.screwfix.com/p/manrose-1361-remote-bathroom-fan-humidity-control-with-timer/44376
With the idea to perhaps swap to the much better looking MS Electronics one once it becomes available. This Manrose 1361 also had a run on timer which is duplication because the fan has one too, but since the MS Elec humidistat doesn't have a run on timer, I wanted to design the system to use the run on timer on the fan only.
This is idea 1 - does that all initially sound possible?
I was also doing further research into the pitfalls of using humidistats to control bathroom fans, and it seems to be the case that the humidity in a bathroom can swing quite wildly to extremes during the shower and post shower phase. So I was thinking perhaps it might be possible to create a system that triggered the fan the first time the humidistat read a high humidity (i.e when the shower goes on) - but then disregarded the reading from the humidistat for a set amount of time to ensure the fan wasn't constantly cycling on and off which I've heard can sometime be a problem? This is idea 1A!
Is idea 1A possible? Or would it make more sense to just stick with the simpler idea 1.
I am doing this because my kids will never remember to manually turn on the extractor fan, and are starting to take longer and longer showers!
Many thanks
(We don't want the fan to be connected to the light switch in any way.)
I was planning on this fan: https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/SLTD250SILENTslashT.html
As it has a run on timer built in that could be useful to use within the system.
I was initially planning on getting this remote humidistat: https://mselectronics.co.uk/product/remote-bathroom-fan-humidity-control/
But the manufacturer has just told me they are having component supply issues, so there wont be any for at least 2 months.
So I have switched to this one: https://www.screwfix.com/p/manrose-1361-remote-bathroom-fan-humidity-control-with-timer/44376
With the idea to perhaps swap to the much better looking MS Electronics one once it becomes available. This Manrose 1361 also had a run on timer which is duplication because the fan has one too, but since the MS Elec humidistat doesn't have a run on timer, I wanted to design the system to use the run on timer on the fan only.
This is idea 1 - does that all initially sound possible?
I was also doing further research into the pitfalls of using humidistats to control bathroom fans, and it seems to be the case that the humidity in a bathroom can swing quite wildly to extremes during the shower and post shower phase. So I was thinking perhaps it might be possible to create a system that triggered the fan the first time the humidistat read a high humidity (i.e when the shower goes on) - but then disregarded the reading from the humidistat for a set amount of time to ensure the fan wasn't constantly cycling on and off which I've heard can sometime be a problem? This is idea 1A!
Is idea 1A possible? Or would it make more sense to just stick with the simpler idea 1.
I am doing this because my kids will never remember to manually turn on the extractor fan, and are starting to take longer and longer showers!
Many thanks
