S
sodthisforfun
Perhaps Boris needs some better lackies to help him get on top of things too?!
Boris gets owned by Ed Milliband
- Thread starter Notch7
- Start date
Sponsored Links
He doesn't need to. He is the PM with an 80 majority and only needs to sit back and take the flack. The majority of his rebellious Tory MPs will at worse, abstain from the final vote so the Bill will still pass.
Boris knows that he will be pushed out by the Tories "men in grey suits" at some convenient time prior to the next election.
I have no doubt the knives are being sharpened. As long as they deliver their manifesto, it doesn't matter who is leading them.
Sponsored Links
Labour don't have to do anything.
The EU won't allow the integrity of the Single Market to be damaged, so this Internal market bill can't go anywhere.
There has to be a border between GB and NI.
If the UK thinks it can win a trade war with the EU it is wrong.
There will be a border between GB and NI, but GB won't be allowing tariffs or food blockades which the EU seem intent on. It won't happen because Boris will protect GB's interests.
A commercial contract can be nullified if the T&Cs are found to be unreasonable and disadvantageous to one party.
An international treaty which was agreed knowing that one party was seeking full independence, could argue that the T&Cs allowing a border to be enforced to 'split' the country, could be construed as 'unreasonable'.
An international treaty which was agreed knowing that one party was seeking full independence, could argue that the T&Cs allowing a border to be enforced to 'split' the country, could be construed as 'unreasonable'.
- Joined
- 17 May 2012
- Messages
- 10,782
- Reaction score
- 849
- Country
Do you understand the implications of the UK leaving the Single Market?
I think you are going to be surprised.
- Joined
- 17 May 2012
- Messages
- 10,782
- Reaction score
- 849
- Country
A commercial contract can be nullified if the T&Cs are found to be unreasonable and disadvantageous to one party.
An international treaty which was agreed knowing that one party was seeking full independence, could argue that the T&Cs allowing a border to be enforced to 'split' the country, could be construed as 'unreasonable'.
That's rather missing the point.
NI stay in the Single Market for goods. There has to be a customs border.
The SM is an economic zone of $15 trillion, the EU will protect the integrity of that market
Yes, and it was accepted there would be 'some' checks. It was never on the cards that there would be tariffs between GB and NI, or indeed that the EU would prevent the movement of food from GB to NI over concerns about 'standards', standards which incidentally, happen to be the same as the EU's.
The EU like ROI have massively overplayed their hand and broken the terms of the WA, hence the need for the 'Internal Market Bill'.
NI stays in the SM for goods.
It will be in a different regulatory jurisdiction.
Tariffs aren't the primary issue.
Hilarious you think Boris has ever protected the interests of the UK
That's an interesting point.
Of course, the agreement Buffoon negotiated and agreed is not a commercial contract. But you are suggesting now that he agreed it without reading or understanding it, and that Britain has no treaty experts capable of studying international agreements.
One of those suggestions is ridiculous.
By the way, you mentioned earlier "a single line."
What is that line?
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
