Building an extension using 300mm thermalite blocks

Joined
14 Oct 2008
Messages
995
Reaction score
13
Location
Surrey
Country
United Kingdom
I like the idea of using these due to speed of construction and not having a cavity to faff about insulating BUT no-one seems to build this way, why is that?
 
I like the idea of using these due to speed of construction and not having a cavity to faff about insulating BUT no-one seems to build this way, why is that?
Because you don't need 300mm block for a compliant solid wall. You only need a 215mm thick block with around 60mm of internal insulation.
 
Because who wants a horrible block or high maintenance rendered wall?

And is it actually quicker?
 
Forgive my ignorance, but, I thought if you use 215mm blocks you need 100mm of kingspan on the inside or if you use 300mm blocks you only need 50mm kingspan, am I wrong?

On a seperate note, will a 100mm thermalite block that is unfinished allow rain penetration through to the inside face?
 
Forgive my ignorance, but, I thought if you use 215mm blocks you need 100mm of kingspan on the inside or if you use 300mm blocks you only need 50mm kingspan, am I wrong?
You are wrong. 100mm of AAC block is nothing like as efficient an insulator as 50mm of Kingspan. 100mm of AAC block is actually about as effiecient as 10-15mm of Kingspan.

On a seperate note, will a 100mm thermalite block that is unfinished allow rain penetration through to the inside face?
They say that AAC blocks do not allow water to penetrate, but that isn't the only issue. You've still got the mortar joints through which water could penetrate.
100mm blockwork or brickwork can be used as a cladding, but there will be further structure as an inner leaf whether it's timber frame or lightweight steelwork between an RC or structural steel frame.
Whatever the construction, there should be a detail that ensures any water getting through to the inside face will be guided back to the outside.
 
RR, we have a misunderstanding, I looked on some block manufacturers sites and I thought they were saying 'if you use our 215mm block you need 100mm of kingspan attached to the inside face of that wall to comply with U value requirements, if a 300mm block is used only 50mm of kingspan needs to be attached (directly to wall surface)'.

Good point, the block may not transmit, but the mortar could do!
 
RR, we have a misunderstanding, I looked on some block manufacturers sites and I thought they were saying 'if you use our 215mm block you need 100mm of kingspan attached to the inside face of that wall to comply with U value requirements, if a 300mm block is used only 50mm of kingspan needs to be attached (directly to wall surface)'
There would have to be a large difference in the thermal conductivity of the 215mm and the 300mm blocks for this to be the case. If the thermal conductivity was the same, as I said above, 10-15mm of additional Kingspan would be all that you would require to give you the same U-value if using 215mm blocks compared to 300mm. And you end up with a thinner wall.

Have you got a link to that site? I'd like to see for myself what it says.
 
I've just looked on the celcon and thermalite sites and both say 215mm blocks and 50mm thermal boards and as you say RR the difference using 300mm blocks is negligible, thank god I asked the question, now I stand corrected!
 
You can build your wall however you like so long as your building control officer is satisfied it meets the legal provisions for thermal efficiency and resistance to moisture
 

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Back
Top