<div class="bbWrapper"><blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="benstoneham" data-source="post: 819759"
class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-title">
<a href="/diy/goto/post?id=819759"
class="bbCodeBlock-sourceJump"
rel="nofollow"
data-xf-click="attribution"
data-content-selector="#post-819759">benstoneham said:</a>
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent ">
However, when you think about it, the 100w guideline assumes 230v i.e. 0.43A per lamp. At 100v (which is what the balasts run at), the same calculation produces 0.63A - a 43% difference.
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink js-expandLink"><a role="button" tabindex="0">Click to expand...</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>100W is 100W is 100W.<br />
<br />
If the lamps were ELV, you'd have a figure of 5.25A <b>for the lamp</b>, but it would still only be 0.27A <b>for the circuit</b>.<br />
<br />
<blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source=""
class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent ">
I've searched everything I can think of, but can't see a guide on this.
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink js-expandLink"><a role="button" tabindex="0">Click to expand...</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>Try <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohms_law" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">this... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f606.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":lol:" title="Laugh :lol:" data-smilie="18"data-shortname=":lol:" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f606.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":lol:" title="Laugh :lol:" data-smilie="18"data-shortname=":lol:" /> </a><br />
<br />
<blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source=""
class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent ">
I suppose a second related question is whether the Design Current for a lighting circuit can take account of the type of lamp holder in use (for example, while a GU10 can take anything upto a 100W GU10, a GX10 can only take a 35W Sylvania HID. If this was the case then the Design calc could use the actual I guess.
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink js-expandLink"><a role="button" tabindex="0">Click to expand...</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>Isn't the whole point of the 100W rule that anyone could come along and change the luminaire or fit a different lamp? I know it's hopelessly outdated though, as it harks back to the time when all there was were 40/60/100W GLS...<br />
<br />
<blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source=""
class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent ">
Also, if this is a single radial supplying all of these lights in the same room, am I right in saying that it is not appropriate to apply 66% diversity guideline as it is likely they will be used simultaneously.
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink js-expandLink"><a role="button" tabindex="0">Click to expand...</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>In any diversity calculation the designer must be guided by his knowledge and expertise. If you judge that they'll all be on then you can't use diversity....</div>