Surely, 'we' is the FIRST person!Is your English that weak that you assume that I'm speaking for others on here with the use of the term "we"?you are seeking clarification of my position using the third person
Surely, 'we' is the FIRST person!Is your English that weak that you assume that I'm speaking for others on here with the use of the term "we"?you are seeking clarification of my position using the third person
Surely, 'we' is the FIRST person!Is your English that weak that you assume that I'm speaking for others on here with the use of the term "we"?you are seeking clarification of my position using the third person
Does anyone know what Newboy's position/opinion actually is since reading through the thread doesn't make it any clearer and he, himself doesn't seem to know
Sorry, but I had to laugh. Look things up before you make statements like that. It saves looking (more) like an idiot.First person is "I" - I don't understand
Third person is "we" - we don't understand
No problems. It's the sort of thing most of us learned in nursery.Well that'll teach me to be a smarta*se
You forgot to remind him about the apology!No problems. It's the sort of thing most of us learned in nursery.Well that'll teach me to be a smarta*se
Now, without any tit for tat, what was the point you were trying to make?
Softly, softly, catchy monkeyYou forgot to remind him about the apology!No problems. It's the sort of thing most of us learned in nursery.Well that'll teach me to be a smarta*se
Now, without any tit for tat, what was the point you were trying to make?
No problems. It's the sort of thing most of us learned in nursery.Well that'll teach me to be a smarta*se
Now, without any tit for tat, what was the point you were trying to make?
Didn't take me long to spot a tit. And as for the tat,