I have been under the timber suspended ground floor of our 60s detached house, insulating the floor from underneath (via a crawl space) using Knauf Ekoroll.
Whilst down there, I noticed the ground was slightly damp around where the soil pipe from the upstairs bathroom goes from the ground floor through to the outside (see first photo).
The damp is only in that corner. I cannot feel or see any damp on the pipe itself. So my first thought is inadequate airflow has meant a build up of condensation (it was surprisingly warm down in the space, and of course the pipe is going to be comparably cold).
So I thought: check the airbricks. There are 2 outside; one on the front of the house, one on the side. From the crawl space (in the dark!) it’s clear the side airbrick was completely clear, but I couldn’t see any daylight through the one on the front of the house.
Here's the side one:
So I checked outside, and it’s now I start to feel a bit foolish. The reason I couldn’t even get a bent wire coathanger through this ‘blocked’ airbrick: it’s bricked up!
Er, here's the front one!:
What is confusing for me is that, from the inside of the house (in the crawl space) it looks like it’s always been bricked up, as if it was never actually a functioning airbrick. The bricks and mortar where this airbrick would be look the same age as the rest to me (see picture 2. Note: the pipe in this photo is a different soil pipe from the downstairs cloakroom). I can’t believe a builder or previous owner would decide to brick up the airbrick, and be really careful to match old with new??
So my questions are:
Is a build up of condensation a likely cause for a slightly damp ground below a house?
Is it common for a house to have an airbrick on the outside, that was never actually installed, as it were?
Whilst down there, I noticed the ground was slightly damp around where the soil pipe from the upstairs bathroom goes from the ground floor through to the outside (see first photo).
The damp is only in that corner. I cannot feel or see any damp on the pipe itself. So my first thought is inadequate airflow has meant a build up of condensation (it was surprisingly warm down in the space, and of course the pipe is going to be comparably cold).
So I thought: check the airbricks. There are 2 outside; one on the front of the house, one on the side. From the crawl space (in the dark!) it’s clear the side airbrick was completely clear, but I couldn’t see any daylight through the one on the front of the house.
Here's the side one:
So I checked outside, and it’s now I start to feel a bit foolish. The reason I couldn’t even get a bent wire coathanger through this ‘blocked’ airbrick: it’s bricked up!
Er, here's the front one!:
What is confusing for me is that, from the inside of the house (in the crawl space) it looks like it’s always been bricked up, as if it was never actually a functioning airbrick. The bricks and mortar where this airbrick would be look the same age as the rest to me (see picture 2. Note: the pipe in this photo is a different soil pipe from the downstairs cloakroom). I can’t believe a builder or previous owner would decide to brick up the airbrick, and be really careful to match old with new??
So my questions are:
Is a build up of condensation a likely cause for a slightly damp ground below a house?
Is it common for a house to have an airbrick on the outside, that was never actually installed, as it were?