Frank Field, Tom Watson in the sights

Status
Not open for further replies.
Media attention is a funny thing.

Just look at all the newspaper and TV commotion demanding Buffoon is expelled from the Con's for anti-Muslim sentiment.
 
Sponsored Links
Media attention is a funny thing.

Just look at all the newspaper and TV commotion demanding Buffoon is expelled from the Con's for anti-Muslim sentiment.

I'm glad he's stuck to his guns. Labour made a rod for their own backs when they adopted identity politics.

It's not anti Muslim if you actually read what he wrote.

‘I would go further and say that it is absolutely ridiculous that people should choose to go around looking like letter boxes.’

But he said a total ban would boost radicals who claim there is a ‘clash of civilisations’ between Islam and the West.
 
did he receive equal attention when he mocked Hassidic style?
 
Sponsored Links
Zionism and National socialism have certain characteristics in common, both are Nationalist ideologies ,both have race myths and both have caused a lot of trouble.
 
Did he share a platform with people who compare Israel to Nazi Germany?

As far as I know, Boris didn't. I expect you are referring to an event in 2010.

As the Times will tell you, In January 2010 when he was a backbencher, Mr Corbyn spoke at and opened a talk entitled Never Again — for Anyone.

"The main talk, entitled The Misuse of the Holocaust for Political Purposes, was delivered by Hajo Meyer, a Jewish survivor of Auschwitz who became a passionate anti-Zionist and repeatedly made the comparison between the Nazi regime and Israeli policy."
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jeremy-corbyn-hosted-event-likening-israel-to-nazis-6sb5rqd5x


Extremists have painted this Jewish survivor as an anti-Semitic, and suggested that no-one should share a platform with a survivor of Auschwitz who does not toe the party line.

You may be surprised to learn that not every Jewish person, nor every Israeli citizen, automatically supports every action of the Israeli government.

Is that what you heard when you were told the story? It's a story which, lightly edited, is being widely circulated.

What did Desmond Tutu, Nobel Peace laureate and retired bishop, say about the neo-Apartheid policies? He is not a prospective Prime Minister so he is not being treated as much of a threat, and not much money is being spent on neutralising him.
 
I dont see how that explains the high level of complaining that is coming from within Labour.

Is Margaret Hodge in cahoots with a foreign government.

I accept Jeremy Corbyn is not rasict or anti jew, but he has shared platforms with those that compare Israel to Nazi Germany and those holocaust deniers.

There maybe foreign government involvement but theyve added to the issue not created it from scratch.
One reason Margret could be so upset is because if Corbyn gets in he could put a stop to tax dodging by people like her.
Margerets family firm turns over billions a year but only pays taxes in the thousands.
 
Apparently as well the burka being banned in Denmark , France , Austria ect

It is also banned in Uzbekastahn which is 97% Islamic ???
 
.We know corbin has views expressing the state of Israel shouldn't exist ...
Nonsense. Corbyn argues for a two-state solution.
IN MEETING WITH JEWISH GROUP, BRITISH LABOR PARTY LEADER ENDORSES TWO STATE SOLUTION
https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/In-m...oup-Corbyn-endorses-two-state-solution-444474

How can anyone sensibly discuss anything with someone who is either so poorly informed, or worse, intentionally deceitful.
Which is it? Are you very poorly informed, or intentionally deceitful?
 
but he has shared platforms with those that compare Israel to Nazi Germany and those holocaust deniers.
Sharing a platform with your political opponents does mean that you agree with their views. Otherwise all politicians in both houses would share the same political views.
 
How can anyone sensibly discuss anything with someone who is either so poorly informed, or worse, intentionally deceitful.
Which is it? Are you very poorly informed, or intentionally deceitful?

Adds nothing to the discussion.

Zero in fact
 
I'm glad he's stuck to his guns.
It's not anti Muslim if you actually read what he wrote.
It is Islamophobic if you use offensive terms to ridicule a whole group of people for their dress code.
His article might not have been intended as Islamophobic, but as soon as he descends into such offensive language as he did, the intention of his article is lost, and his modus operandi is the real issue. It also opens up a whole can of worms about his true motive.

As I have said many times before, it is OK, fine, democratic to discuss difficult issues, but as soon as you revert to offensive language to make your point, your argument is lost, and the discussion is in a downward spiral.

If a politician (never mind one who aspires to be PM) cannot appreciate that, and is unable to make his point without such offensive terms, then he should no longer be a politician, especially a politician of one of the main parties.
 
Nonsense. Corbyn argues for a two-state solution.
https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/In-m...oup-Corbyn-endorses-two-state-solution-444474

How can anyone sensibly discuss anything with someone who is either so poorly informed, or worse, intentionally deceitful.
Which is it? Are you very poorly informed, or intentionally deceitful?

Adds nothing to the discussion.

Zero in fact
You omitted the first part of my post, intentionally, I suspect to make an invalid point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top