how soon will Trump back down over tariffs

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not been widely reported, but if you care to look you'll find that Hamas quietly changed the statistics removing many thousands of women and children from the previous reported figures.
Hamas's own figures now confirm 72% of casualties were males between 13-55 years old, the typical hamas fighting age demographic.
I see Fillyboy doesnt say which Israeli propaganda source he got this from
 
The Israeli civilian to combatant death rate will obviously be a lot lower. The deaths are largely front line troops dressed as soldiers not hiding behind children.
Filly provides zero evidence to support his Israeli propaganda
 
It's not been widely reported, but if you care to look you'll find that Hamas quietly changed the statistics removing many thousands of women and children from the previous reported figures.
Hamas's own figures now confirm 72% of casualties were males between 13-55 years old, the typical hamas fighting age demographic.
and what a surprise: the source of this claim comes from Honest Reporting (sic)

"Honest Reporting" is a pro Israel pressure group

the words Filly quoted "Quietly change the statistics blah blah blah.................." have been published verbatim in loads of right wing biased publications like the Telegraph, Spectator etc etc


Filly just posts Israel propaganda
 
The Israeli civilian to combatant death rate will obviously be a lot lower. The deaths are largely front line troops dressed as soldiers not hiding behind children.
Says an Israeli propaganda source.

A peer reviewed source says the deaths in Gaza are much higher

Research published in the Lancet medical journal estimates that the death toll in Gaza during the first nine months of the Israel-Hamas war was about 40% higher than numbers recorded by the Palestinian territory’s health ministry.

The peer-reviewed statistical analysis was conducted by academics at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Yale University and other institutions,
 
USA businesses are worried Canadian consumers may still not come back even if tariffs are lifted.

Canada has been a very good partner to the states and is very upset with how they have been treated

 
Maybe Kieth has an opportunity to do a deal while Chinna shafts the US. Let's hope he doesn't sell out British farmers and business like Borris’ oven ready burnt offering
 
Filly provides zero evidence to support his Israeli propaganda


Approximately 72% of fatalities are aged 13-55 and are men - the demographic category aligns with Hamas combatants.

Hamas quietly removed the names of thousands of Palestinians it had previously alleged were killed during the Israel-Hamas war, Salo Aizenberg, from the US-based non-profit organisation Honest Reporting told The Telegraph on Tuesday after analyzing Hamas’s March 2025 casualty update.

Hamas has previously claimed that 70% of casualties have been women and children, a claim no longer reflected in their recently updated lists, according to the research. Approximately 72% of fatalities between the ages of 13-55 are men - the demographic category aligns with Hamas combatants.

“Hamas’s new March 2025 fatality list quietly drops 3,400 fully ‘identified’ deaths listed in its August and October 2024 reports – including 1,080 children. These ‘deaths’ never happened. The numbers were falsified – again,” Aizenberg asserted.
HonestReporting analyzes stories, articles, opinion pieces and images that appear in the media’s coverage of Israel, exposing and responding to inaccuracies or bias. Browse our homepage to see our latest critiques and features, both in written and video form.
 
Honest reporting , hmmmm ?

  • Overall, we rate HonestReporting Right-Center Biased based on support for right-leaning nationalist political parties. We also rate them as Mostly Factual rather than High due to the promotion of nationalist propaganda.
 
Salo Aizenberg, from the US-based non-profit organisation Honest Reporting told The Telegraph


Well that's odd.

If the information was coming from the Palestinian government, you'd expect to see quotes of its words, and a link to the source.
 

Some 3,400 names were removed from the most recent death reports from the Strip, raising concerns of inflated figures by Hamas.

The Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza has removed thousands of names from its death toll in its March casualty update without any notice, a new research by two separate reports claims.
Some 3,400 previously identified deaths from its August and October 2024 reports can no longer be found in the PDFs released by the ministry, which doesn’t differentiate between combatants and civilians.
At least 1,000 children are among those no longer on the list, according to two research reports, which corroborated each other's findings.
The data, showing ID numbers that have been removed from the ministry's most recent report, was made public on Monday by Salo Eisenberg, a researcher with the US-based NGO Honest Reporting.

"The lists were quite unreliable. We found rafts and rafts of mistakes," Andrew Fox, associate fellow at the UK-based think tank Henry Jackson Society, told Euronews.

The discrepancy has made researchers concerned about the possibility of numbers being intentionally inflated by Hamas, especially since the health ministry’s figures are widely reported in international media and seen as relevant by the likes of the UN, and triggering widespread social response and even political developments.

The concern is particularly exacerbated by the fact that the lists can be filled by anyone with a link to the document made available on Google Docs.

In turn, this means that Hamas could have gone through the list and deliberately added further names as casualties, affecting the total, but also the demographics of the victims.

"There were three reporting methodologies," said Fox, who published his analysis in December 2024. "There's actually having a physical body in a hospital. There's media sources, so the government media office essentially trawls social media to try and find reports of people who died and they add them to the list."

"And then the third methodology is an online Google form that anyone can just fill in. You could fill it in right now. And that gets added to the list."

The big issue that stems from these findings is the discrepancy between the age and gender of those killed, which can make a difference between pointing to indiscriminate killings and typical combatant casualties in urban warfare, researchers believe, which is a key talking point among the anti-Israeli critics.

At the same time, Gaza is also one of the most densely populated places on Earth where almost 50% of the population is under 18 — compared to 18% in the European Union — meaning a high number of civilian casualties remains plausible, especially among the youth.

This opens the door to the possibility that the militant group is tweaking the numbers to turn the narrative to one of civilian plight and tragedy targeting women and children, while obfuscating its losses — and its role in the conflict.

"If you were seeing indiscriminate killing, you would expect roughly 26% adult male deaths," Fox said. "In the 13 to 55 age group, which is Hamas' fighter range because we know they use child soldiers, it's 72% male in that age group."

"So all these things clearly point towards combatants being targeted rather than just indiscriminate killing."

The Hamas-run health ministry figures were considered accurate in previous conflicts in Gaza as independent international organisations corroborated them.

However, this is no longer the case ever since the start of the Israel-Hamas war sparked by the militant group’s 7 October attacks, killing some 1,200 civilians in Israel and taking hundreds hostage, as it became impossible to verify any claims about the situation on the ground due to a media blackout.

The health ministry has recently claimed that the number of deaths in the Strip has now surpassed 50,000. The Israeli military says it has killed some 20,000 Hamas combatants, while also reporting around 3,000 dead and wounded among its soldiers.

At the same time, it is unclear whether the ministry's computer system outage in November had any impact on the numbers it reported, which Fox says could also explain some of the errors. Other issues with the reports, however, point to questionable practices, he explained.

"I'd be very surprised if natural deaths weren't included on that list, because there's been no separate reporting of natural deaths whatsoever," he said.

"But by the same token, it is also very difficult. So on top of the stats padding, there will also be genuine mistakes on there."

"It's still a tragedy, no matter how many civilians have died," Fox pointed out. "But I think it's been remiss of the world's media to try and take these figures as gospel when plainly there are combatants dying."
 

Approximately 72% of fatalities are aged 13-55 and are men - the demographic category aligns with Hamas combatants.

Hamas quietly removed the names of thousands of Palestinians it had previously alleged were killed during the Israel-Hamas war, Salo Aizenberg, from the US-based non-profit organisation Honest Reporting told The Telegraph on Tuesday after analyzing Hamas’s March 2025 casualty update.

Hamas has previously claimed that 70% of casualties have been women and children, a claim no longer reflected in their recently updated lists, according to the research. Approximately 72% of fatalities between the ages of 13-55 are men - the demographic category aligns with Hamas combatants.

“Hamas’s new March 2025 fatality list quietly drops 3,400 fully ‘identified’ deaths listed in its August and October 2024 reports – including 1,080 children. These ‘deaths’ never happened. The numbers were falsified – again,” Aizenberg asserted.
HonestReporting analyzes stories, articles, opinion pieces and images that appear in the media’s coverage of Israel, exposing and responding to inaccuracies or bias. Browse our homepage to see our latest critiques and features, both in written and video form.
“Honest reporting” is a pro Israel propaganda outlet.

The guy quoted in the article, Salo Aizenberg, is from Honest Reporting. He isn't an unbiased source and Honest Reporting isn't just a "US-based non-profit organisation" as the article states.

It's a US-based pro-Israel organization. Aizneberg is on the Board of Directors of Honest Reporting and according to his LinkedIn seems to be the owner of an investment advisory firm in New York and not any kind of researcher or journalist

Editorially, they hold pro-Israel nationalist positions in favor of Benjamin Netanyahu and the current nationalist parties. Some might call them a propaganda source


However, a closer analysis of the report’s key findings reveals significant flaws in its evidence and reasoning. While it identifies instances of misclassification and questionable claims by the MoH, these errors appear to be more indicative of random mistakes than systematic manipulation. Furthermore, the small number of errors identified is insufficient to meaningfully shift overall casualty demographics.
Fox’s argument that media outlets have uncritically echoed MoH claims is valid in part, particularly regarding misreported death tolls and the attribution of responsibility for certain attacks. His attempt to reconcile MoH death counts with IDF claims of militant fatalities is fraught with methodological issues and unsupported assumptions. Without greater transparency from both the MoH and IDF, such reconciliations remain speculative at best.
Ultimately, while the report underscores the importance of media scrutiny and the verification of war casualty figures, its own selective presentation of evidence undermines its most serious claims. Balanced reporting requires scepticism toward all parties in conflict, and while the media should critically assess MoH data, the same standard should apply to IDF casualty claims.
The truth, as is often the case in wartime, is far more complex than Fox’s report allows

Flawed critique: how Andrew Fox’s report on Gaza death toll for the Henry Jackson Society lacks evidence for key claims​


 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top