- Joined
- 25 Apr 2023
- Messages
- 9,325
- Reaction score
- 6,400
- Country

Of course he can, was just joining in...sorry.Can't he defend himself?

Of course he can, was just joining in...sorry.Can't he defend himself?

And people should pay more tax to pay for everyone's care below £100k? Mick and Elton get free care up to £100k as well, which we should pay for?Up the limit you can keep from 16k (I think it is now) to 100k maybe?
Do you mean you don't do theoretical? Strange...
I think that's different to someone having to give up his 120k flat when the council bloke upstairs doesn't have to.

ExactlyThe council bloke upstairs doesn't have a flat to give![]()
And people should pay more tax to pay for everyone's care below £100k? Mick and Elton get free care up to £100k as well, which we should pay for?

I don't know all the answers, having seen it myself I know its heartbreaking for the person that wants to leave their 50k savings to their children but they cant.And people should pay more tax to pay for everyone's care below £100k? Mick and Elton get free care up to £100k as well, which we should pay for?
Serious question.

So what?The savings limit is £23K for care.

It's a worthwhile conversation about where the cut off point should be, but there are implications. @diy_fun_uk also wants to do away with IHT and CGT. We would all have to pick up a hefty bill for all of that.Maybe I'm wrong.

Yes, but we shouldn't be punished for hard work and saving a few bob.We would all have to pick up a hefty bill for all of that.
So what?

Some see it as a punishment, some see it as the better off contributing to society, because they can..Yes, but we shouldn't be punished for hard work and saving a few bob.

It was a response the £100k suggestion by pete.Your post was ambiguous.

So you don't mind the limit being 23k?Some see it as a punishment, some see it as the better off contributing to society, because they can..

It isn't something I worry about.So you don't mind the limit being 23k?