Most serious

ok so lets lock them up at the taxpayers' expense for 39000 years.... great move... imho...

and WDIK i haven't a clue what you're on about... but it sounds like you're talking about families committing these crimes, and then suggesting i should check my own circumstances... seriously, don't accuse me of such things - if i've misunderstood your post then.... explain, but if not.... welll any reasonable man will have the same red mist i'm looking through !!!!!!
 
Sponsored Links
ok so lets lock them up at the taxpayers' expense for 39000 years.... great move... imho...
Glad to see that you're seeing sense.

Mind you - it isn't necessary to lock them up for quite that long...

Thank-you for patronising me ! but i suspect you're right........ 10,000 years would be enough !

but hey, i have to tell you that i'm disgusted that your argument seems to suggest ANY leniency for convicted paeds !!! what is wrong with you?
 
ok so lets lock them up at the taxpayers' expense for 39000 years.... great move... imho...

and WDIK i haven't a clue what you're on about... but it sounds like you're talking about families committing these crimes, and then suggesting i should check my own circumstances... seriously, don't accuse me of such things - if i've misunderstood your post then.... explain, but if not.... welll any reasonable man will have the same red mist i'm looking through !!!!!!

No not at all, the thing is people tend to get wound up by the media to see a wolf around every corner.

thats a false memory implanted by todays society and media, the question is which came first?

statistically.
not your own personal circumstances.

the majority of crimes against the person,
committed against the victim by a familly member :(
 
Sponsored Links
These vile people are always given a warm welcome in the prisons though so I am told! :D
 
Never seen one get injured yet, they get hurt, the officer in charge gets hurt (maybe no job ) that's nowadays!
 
the majority of crimes against the person,
committed against the victim by a familly member :(
But that doesn't lessen the severity of the crime - often quite the reverse as it adds a betrayal of trust.
 
the majority of crimes against the person,
committed against the victim by a familly member :(
But that doesn't lessen the severity of the crime - often quite the reverse as it adds a betrayal of trust.

yes agreed.
there was a survey done recently concerning male parentage how of their own supposed spawn,

interesting facts :confused:
 
imamartian said:
Wrong... they should be killed for having one !!!! that would stop them !!

Consider this. Each image has undoubtedly been downloaded many times. It was uploaded only once by whoever committed the actual abuse. (Let's take the worst case scenario here and assume that it's real.) Rather than rounding up all the downloaders and lining them up in front of the firing squad, wouldn't it be more productive to track down the uploader? :?: :?: :?:

The funny thing is, I've pointed this out to lot's of people and had some odd responses. This one really took the proverbial biscuit ---

"But they're not so bad. they're only in it for the money." :eek: :eek: :eek:

Having said that, BAS is correct here ---

--- by providing a market for the images he promoted and encouraged abuse by others.

So, to get back to the original post. Suppose you go to a pay-to-view website and download a video of somebody else's nail bomb going off. :eek: :eek: :eek: Is this better or worse than making nail bombs yourself? :confused: :confused: :confused:
 
Whats that :?:

Is it solitary :?:

Rule 47 places them in an area for their own protection. Which is generally one of the biggest wings of a jail. Which includes Sex Offenders, Ex-Cops/Judges/Prison Warders/MP's/Supergrasses/looneys etc etc

As a aside does anyone know why in prison the Sex Offenders are called Nonces???
 
Sentencing him to 11 years for terrorism offences and five years for the child pornography charges, Judge John Milford said Gilleard may not have formulated any specific targets and appeared to be a "lone wolf".
I knew I'd seen it somewhere that he was going to be sentenced.
I wonder if the judicary take their lead from the government that this mans terroist leanings are more severe than any paedophilia urges.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top