- Joined
- 16 Oct 2021
- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country

I'm currently renovating an ensuite bathroom in an extension that was added to our house by the previous owners more than 20 years ago. After removing the old plasterboard I uncovered the crack in the images. It appears the cavity blocks of the extension are not tied into the original house (the white wall is the original house gable wall).
On the outside there was some form of mastic I think applied to the gap and in the 10 years we've owned the house It's remained stable i.e. the crack hasn't widened.
Am I ok to rake any of the loose mortar out and fill the crack with something? (I'm thinking foam). The gap goes fully through to the outside render so I'm thinking foam for the thermal benefits. The wall will be battened, insulated and plasterboarded.
Or should I get it investigated further? When we bought the house the surveyor wouldn't have seen it but they would have seen the mastic repair. I found this line in the original surveyor report "There is some cracking on the rear of the property, which we believe has been caused by old settlement of the building but
this is not considered significant and no remedial work is necessary. Nevertheless, the cracks should be filled to prevent water penetration." - the only thing that doesn't make sense here is the crack was filled and I don't see any other cracks.
Thanks
On the outside there was some form of mastic I think applied to the gap and in the 10 years we've owned the house It's remained stable i.e. the crack hasn't widened.
Am I ok to rake any of the loose mortar out and fill the crack with something? (I'm thinking foam). The gap goes fully through to the outside render so I'm thinking foam for the thermal benefits. The wall will be battened, insulated and plasterboarded.
Or should I get it investigated further? When we bought the house the surveyor wouldn't have seen it but they would have seen the mastic repair. I found this line in the original surveyor report "There is some cracking on the rear of the property, which we believe has been caused by old settlement of the building but
this is not considered significant and no remedial work is necessary. Nevertheless, the cracks should be filled to prevent water penetration." - the only thing that doesn't make sense here is the crack was filled and I don't see any other cracks.
Thanks