Polanski’s popularity plummets

It has, as explained in the article.

It's plummeted from a very high point, but is still high.

The collapse will be later, once people see through what's been a very rapid rise based on little more than protest and misinformation.
 
You mean they're not a single-issue party? Isn't that a good thing?
They once were, now they're a party of multiple entangled and contradictory issues.

Their Gorton and Denton campaign ads were published in multiple languages. Which is sadly a sign of the times. But what made them different is that they weren't simple translations - they were stating different things to their different audiences.
 
They once were, now they're a party of multiple entangled and contradictory issues.

Their Gorton and Denton campaign ads were published in multiple languages. Which is sadly a sign of the times. But what made them different is that they weren't simple translations - they were stating different things to their different audiences.
Because you don't have the intelligence to understand the relationship between issues doesn't mean that they're contradictory.
 
When they're banging on about the middle east in a foreign language then their native british voters would be interested to know that they're not focused on the UK and their needs.

They're selling different messages to different audiences. In other words deceiving voters.
 
This is widely the view reported in the press, even the lefty press, that Zack Polanski, aka David Paulden's bust up with the met has exposed him.
 
Out of interest, what do the traitors here think of Reform receiving millions of funding from foreign billionaires? In particular Farage's recent "gift" of £5,000,000 from a Thai based cripto billionaire?

Honestly I don't care.

The UK political system doesn't fund parties, so they need to get money from somewhere. I'm absolutely content that Reform are the best of the bunch, I don't expect perfection.

Take your selective blinkers off, all parties have accepted money from all kinds of dubious sources.
 
Do I really need to explain the absolute basics of online translation?

Sigh...
So present one of these apparent documents, for me to translate.

But you did originally say:
When they're banging on about the middle east in a foreign language then their native british voters would be interested to know that they're not focused on the UK and their needs.

They're selling different messages to different audiences. In other words deceiving voters.
Which implies it was oral.
So show me the translations that you have to justify your accusation:
they're not focused on the UK and their needs.
They're selling different messages to different audiences.
 
3rd place, behind labour and Reform - well done greens :lol:
Two genuine Re form MPs as opposed to 8 Greens in Parliament, and a Labor majority of around 174. It will be the same whatever the results of the locals yet Far rage persist in saying ivote re form and get rid of Starmmer.
 
Back
Top