• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Pound at all time low? Well that was a lot of fuss about nothing...

The Bank of England disagrees with you.

Plus you seem to completely misunderstand how the economy actually works. You seem to think £s circulate around the economy forever; they don't.

Thank you, but you didn't answer my question, which was:

If your "money can be created from nothing" statement was true, why doesn't the government solve all our problems by printing us all a million pounds each?
 
UK govt instructs the BoE to create new £s every time govt spends. The BoE must comply. There's no debate.

There are a couple of assumptions in your question:

1. Govt wants to solve all your problems
2. Govt giving everyone a million quid would 'solve all our problems'

The only way govt could give us all a million pounds each would be to have parliament authorise that spending. Theoretically they could do that any year. They haven't done it yet and I wouldn't hold your breath.

So either 1 or 2 are incorrect assumptions or both 1 and 2 are incorrect. I'd go for both.

I assume you would simply want to inject the extra million each without considering any offsets, that right?
 
UK govt instructs the BoE to create new £s every time govt spends. The BoE must comply. There's no debate.

There are a couple of assumptions in your question:

1. Govt wants to solve all your problems
2. Govt giving everyone a million quid would 'solve all our problems'

The only way govt could give us all a million pounds each would be to have parliament authorise that spending. Theoretically they could do that any year. They haven't done it yet and I wouldn't hold your breath.

So either 1 or 2 are incorrect assumptions or both 1 and 2 are incorrect. I'd go for both.

I assume you would simply want to inject the extra million each without considering any offsets, that right?

Most of that is beside the point. I am asking, if the govt can create money from nothing, why don't they, when the country's problems are all caused by a shortage of money?

They do appear to want to solve our money problems - shortly they will be giving everybody £400. Why could they not make it a million each, or £500 each, or even £401 each?
 
Most of that is beside the point. I am asking, if the govt can create money from nothing, why don't they, when the country's problems are all caused by a shortage of money?
The country's problems are caused by a shortage of money? Eh?

Care to explain?
 
No, just answer my question!
Calm down, no need to give yourself an aneurysm.

Your question is built on a false premise - the false premise that there is a actual shortage of £s available.

£s are not a scarce resource, they aren't dug out of the ground or hacked from a mountain or made in a big £s factory somewhere.

The reality is the UK govt is not fiscally constrained in any way; whatever spending parliament approves, regardless of size or purpose, cannot legally be stopped.

Therefore, any 'shortage' of £s is due to political choice.
 
UK govt instructs the BoE to create new £s every time govt spends. The BoE must comply. There's no debate.

There are a couple of assumptions in your question:

1. Govt wants to solve all your problems
2. Govt giving everyone a million quid would 'solve all our problems'

The only way govt could give us all a million pounds each would be to have parliament authorise that spending. Theoretically they could do that any year. They haven't done it yet and I wouldn't hold your breath.

So either 1 or 2 are incorrect assumptions or both 1 and 2 are incorrect. I'd go for both.

I assume you would simply want to inject the extra million each without considering any offsets, that right?
More deflective waffle from the waffle champ.
 
More deflective waffle from the waffle champ.
Instead of waffling about waffle, here's my challenge to you:

. Point out what you think is incorrect about anything I've said
. Put forward your refutation and set out your understanding of how govt injects and drains

Here's what I predict you will do:

. Shout something irrelevant from the sidelines
. Run away when challenged

Here's your chance to prove me wrong.
The floor is yours. Go!
 
Instead of waffling about waffle, here's my challenge to you:

. Point out what you think is incorrect about anything I've said
. Put forward your refutation and set out your understanding of how govt injects and drains

Here's what I predict you will do:

. Shout something irrelevant from the sidelines
. Run away when challenged

Here's your chance to prove me wrong.
The floor is yours. Go!
You’ve disappeared down a MMT rabbit hole.

MMT does not address the opportunity costs and distributional consequences of the monetisation of deficits by the central bank.
 
You’ve disappeared down a MMT rabbit hole.

MMT does not address the opportunity costs and distributional consequences of the monetisation of deficits by the central bank.
Same challenge (and same prediction) to you:

. Point out what you think is incorrect about anything I've said
. Put forward your refutation and set out your understanding of how govt injects and drains

Here's what I predict you will do:

. Shout something irrelevant from the sidelines
. Run away when challenged

Here's your chance to prove me wrong.
The floor is yours. Go!
 
Its Utopia
I think it's a version of Utopia which can be called 'The Golgafrincham Paradigm'; where an unlimited supply of leaves can be used for currency - when fishy says "The reality is the UK govt. is not fiscally constrained in any way; whatever parliament approves, regardless of size or purpose, cannot legally be stopped."
It sounds like "if you print it, they will spend it."
o_O
 
I think it's a version of Utopia which can be called 'The Golgafrincham Paradigm'; where an unlimited supply of leaves can be used for currency - when fishy says "The reality is the UK govt. is not fiscally constrained in any way; whatever parliament approves, regardless of size or purpose, cannot legally be stopped."
It sounds like "if you print it, they will spend it."
o_O
Same challenge (and same prediction) to you:

. Point out what you think is incorrect about anything I've said
. Put forward your refutation and set out your understanding of how govt injects and drains

Here's what I predict you will do:

. Shout something irrelevant from the sidelines
. Run away when challenged

Here's your chance to prove me wrong.
The floor is yours. Go!
 
Printing money causes inflation which gets worse when there aren't enough people and resources to meet demand. That creates more inflation as supply is further squeezed, ultimately leading to civil disorder or worse. Wellyfish, the ultimate test is how people respond in practice to economic theory not what the theory says will happen.

Blup
 
Back
Top