So bloody tedious and inaccurate left whine gers .......

gasbanni

gasbanni

Joined
7 Jan 2007
Messages
8,836
Reaction score
1,230
Country
United Kingdom
I'm sick of the tedious and so inaccurate socialist warriors, reds in the beds mentality and stupidity, get bloody real and answer me this ......anyone who disagrees with them are accused of being a RWR ( right wing racist ).....ok so how come I've got black and brown and mid brown friend's ??
Ok wannabe, Johnny boy and knowsnowt. .....how come some of my younger coloured friends call me their boy ? meaning friend, their terminology .........

Oddly enough me and my mate offered to play a match of pool to a young white couple mid twenties when my friend went to the bogs ( toilet ) they actually said to me " What is it with you two ?" I may look like a bnf member due to my lack of hair ( a physical reality situation rather than a choice based senario ) and our age difference, my reply was that we were mates.
At the time I didn't give it much thought due to the appropriate alcohol consumption, but in retrospect I realised they saw it as an incongruous connection. Maybe they thought it was some sort of gay connection ( yeah as if !). They obviously couldn't understand the Connection. Likewise some on here with tunnel vision equate concerns with uncontrolled immigraton as been racist, or a hatred of foreigners wake up you idiots.

It only becomes a contradiction when due to your own prejudices you label someone a racist when their actions portray the opposite.
 
Sponsored Links
There is running theme on here, anybody that suggests immigration should be limited is automatically labelled far right, xenophobic and racist.

If you ask if they believe freedom of movement should continue, or whether it is sustainable you get no answer. Ive asked JohnD -he doesnt reply....


Here is a typical comment
wannabeDIY said:
The reason why remainers do not bother discussing migration with RWR, is because this is their only, misguided argument, supported by, usually, xenophobic comments. When this argument is countered by valid arguments, they tend to resort to the "extremism", "rape", "scrounging", "Sharia law", "nationalistic" and other such xenophobic comments
Click to expand...
 
It's tunnel vision that they suffer from like the Nazis blamed the jews ,Americans saw commies everywhere, social workers saw devil worship and child abuse everywhere throughout the country ....did that ever exist ?? It's a crowd mob mentality ........reds under the beds .....

Anyone who disagrees with their viewpoint is an enemy and must be an extremist racist .....they're nutters.....they call me a racist.

I'm am a racist if their definition of a racist is someone who sees uncontrolled migration as a problem.
There's that labour nutter who thinks there should be no border controls ........what an idiot most countries have border controls.
 
Sponsored Links
It is well recognised that any current left winger worth his salt will claim that anyone with a contrary point of view is an *ist or a *phobe, spreading *ism or being *phobic.

It's a known phenomenon.

I've been in conversation with some new Corbyn inspired lefties and it's bizarre. Put a reasoned proposition to them, with facts and logical assumptions and rather than hearing a counter argument, you automatically get dismissed (as being an *ist) and then comes the bile and hatred. Completely different from liberals and socialists of the past.

I've only noticed this recently after never experiencing it previously. It's noticeable on here too.

It seems to me that this kind of reaction is an attempt to tap into the current methods employed on social media - of shouting the loudest, of getting attention, getting an audience, crowding out any counter point of view, and harnessing the power of the mob.

And the ironic thing is it's all hipocrisy. And for me, that just demonstrates how weak their arguments are.
 
^woody^ said:
Put a reasoned proposition to them, with facts and logical assumptions and rather than hearing a counter argument, you automatically get dismissed (as being an *ist) and then comes the bile and hatred.
Click to expand...
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Who was it that accused me of plagiarism, without a shred of evidence. You could not even understand the subject of my post.
When challenged, you not only were incapable of providing any evidence, but you resorted to homophobic insults and insults about my family.

You expect to be taken seriously?
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
:rolleyes: or they play the victim card :LOL:

insults about your family. :LOL: the posts were removed using the word "speculation"not abuse or insults :LOL:

incidentally I am pretty certain who my father is , but u raised an interesting point ;)
 
Notch7 said:
There is running theme on here, anybody that suggests immigration should be limited is automatically labelled far right, xenophobic and racist.

If you ask if they believe freedom of movement should continue, or whether it is sustainable you get no answer. Ive asked JohnD -he doesnt reply....


Here is a typical comment
Click to expand...

It's the same with economic migrants from outside EU. Ask any moron who believes in the no borders lunacy, or even someone in favour of admitting those who pretend to be refugees how many we should let in - you will either get no answer or they say it should be limitless. Total imbeciles. They have no idea what limit should be placed on numbers, or think we can accept limitless numbers.
 
wannabeDIY said:
Where there are abusers there will always be victims.
Should the victims be denied a voice.
Should only the abusers be heard?
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

well that depends way r bee ?? on if the victims are porkie piers ? ;) may be hmmmm ???????????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top