Last winter some of my rear side fence came down, and a few weeks ago I started replacing it. I’ve put up five panels, five to go. Six 3” by 3” wooden posts have been in place for 18 years or more, buried in heavy clay, and show no signs of rot. 18 years ago my neighbours replaced four panels, with new ones and 4” by 4” posts. All these posts rotted at ground level. They were set in concrete, but each post was surrounded at ground level by soil. The posts rotted at soil level. The part in the concrete was in each case solid. Clearly the wood was in contact with wet soil and rotted. But why did the posts set only in soil (clay) not rot?
My neighbour suggested that the older posts were better. He might have a point, maybe a better form of preservative.
As an aside, wood buried in clay does not rot as air is excluded. Venice was constructed in the middle of a marsh and each building is built on wooden stakes driven into a clay subsoil. Some of these wooden stake foundations are over 1,000 years old.
My neighbour suggested that the older posts were better. He might have a point, maybe a better form of preservative.
As an aside, wood buried in clay does not rot as air is excluded. Venice was constructed in the middle of a marsh and each building is built on wooden stakes driven into a clay subsoil. Some of these wooden stake foundations are over 1,000 years old.

