- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,768
- Reaction score
- 5,336
- Country

Go for it.Bikerboy thinks he can apply his own meaning to whatever anybody says.
He doesn't like to see racism, apartheid and genocide criticised.


Go for it.Bikerboy thinks he can apply his own meaning to whatever anybody says.
He doesn't like to see racism, apartheid and genocide criticised.

No need to make up lies John. People might think:Bikerboy doesn't like to see racism, apartheid and genocide criticised.
When it is performed by Israel's racist regime.
You are being abusive.

They used to mate. It wasn't looked upon as a crime back then similar to when drink driving wasn't a crime. It was still frowned upon if you was brave enough to voice your opinion..After thinking about this quite a bit, I believe that it is sometimes possible to separate out hatred for an army from hatred for a people. The British Army came to be hated by many Catholics in Northern Ireland. If they had chanted "Death to the British Army", would that have been a hate crime.

Our hate laws didn't exist then. Just as "kill the Germans" during WW2 wasn't a problem, or even "no Blacks, Irish or Dogs" in room adverts during the 1970s.After thinking about this quite a bit, I believe that it is sometimes possible to separate out hatred for an army from hatred for a people. The British Army came to be hated by many Catholics in Northern Ireland. If they had chanted "Death to the British Army", would that have been a hate crime.

Perverse Verdicts are part of the Justice system. I don't think a jury would "certainly find the singer not guilty.", but there is a chance.I can't imagine that the Israeli government really wants this to go to trial. A jury would almost certainly find the singer not guilty. And that would legitimise the use of these slogans.
They used to mate. It wasn't looked upon as a crime back then similar to when drink driving wasn't a crime.
Our hate laws didn't exist then.
Perverse Verdicts are part of the Justice system. I don't think a jury would "certainly find the singer not guilty.", but there is a chance.

Of course it would, chanting the death of anyone regardless who they are, military or not would be considered a hate crime today.OMG
Obviously the hate laws didn't exist back then!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It was a thought experiment. To inform the discussion. The point is whether chanting "Death to the British Army" would have been a hate crime if these laws were in place at the time.

Yes.OMG
Obviously the hate laws didn't exist back then!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It was a thought experiment. To inform the discussion. The point is whether chanting "Death to the British Army" would have been a hate crime if these laws were in place at the time.
I'm not disagreeing but, I think it might be more in the balance."Almost certainly" is what I wrote.
"Almost certainly" is what I wrote.
