THIS HAS TO BE IN THE TOP TEN BLUNNDERS OF ALL TIME

B

BOB.DOLE

In the second world war the para troopers decided to do a surprise attack at night on d day and probably on the bday, but my point is they where off to normandy all in camaflrge black boot polish on their faces, they jumped from the plane as a surprise attack on the germans, but quese what? someone forgot to dye the parachutes black. Icant beleive the numbsculls would send them down with bright white parashutes its behond beleive. Could this be one of solo,s distant brain cells have any thing to do with it.
 
Sponsored Links
in the battle of the Somme they sent thousands of men into murderous machine gun fire just to soak up the German bullets.

put that in the top five.

tragic.
 
noseall said:
in the battle of the Somme they sent thousands of men into murderous machine gun fire just to soak up the German bullets.

put that in the top five.

tragic.

i think they had the idea that they would run out of ammo
 
Hey DOB, you're back. How was Cuba? Sorry not responsible for the white chutes. Too busy telling the Yanks where our boys were so they could dispense their friendly fire.
 
Sponsored Links
Here's a modern army joke for you:

"What's the difference between a British tank and an Iraqui tank?"

"Dunno"

"Welcome to the US Air Force!"
 
BOB.DOLE said:
In the second world war the para troopers decided to do a surprise attack at night on d day and probably on the bday, but my point is they where off to normandy all in camaflrge black boot polish on their faces, they jumped from the plane as a surprise attack on the germans, but quese what? someone forgot to dye the parachutes black. Icant beleive the numbsculls would send them down with bright white parashutes its behond beleive. Could this be one of solo,s distant brain cells have any thing to do with it.
And to top it of They dropped the paras guns of two fields away
 
noseall said:
in the battle of the Somme they sent thousands of men into murderous machine gun fire just to soak up the German bullets.

put that in the top five.

tragic.

I think to qualify as a blunder it needs to be a mistake.......that was more like a war crime against their own troops.
 
Read up your history and you'll change your mind.
 
noseall said:
in the battle of the Somme they sent thousands of men into murderous machine gun fire just to soak up the German bullets.

put that in the top five.

tragic.
Tragic? Certainly. Blunder? Certainly not.

And how is this any more tragic than other aspects of warfare, all of which involve the tactical maining and killing of both soldiers and civilians in pursuit of the strategic plan of overpowering the opposition?
 
Softus said:
noseall said:
in the battle of the Somme they sent thousands of men into murderous machine gun fire just to soak up the German bullets.

put that in the top five.

tragic.
Tragic? Certainly. Blunder? Certainly not.

And how is this any more tragic than other aspects of warfare, all of which involve the tactical maining and killing of both soldiers and civilians in pursuit of the strategic plan of overpowering the opposition?

it isn't any more tragic.

even pedants make spelling errors. i take it you meant maiming?
 
2 army jokes

the french army has two states of alert















run / hide






what can you do with toast that you cant do with frenchmen












make soldiers
 
Hello, Slogger, I think you have been reading the American joke sites too much.

They got really cross when the French (Freedom fries anyone?) said to George W "No, don't want to join in, we see no evidence that they've got weapons of mass destruction; we don't believe it will be quick and easy; we don't believe we can just set up a friendly government, and that everything will be great." Perhaps it was more comfortable for the American to create their own myth that the French wouldn't play because they were cowards.

Sadly on this occasion George W was wrong and the froggies were right. The Halliburton Oil war is still going on, casualties are high and rising, and the US has more enemies now than when they started.

The French (and most European nations) have a tendency to avoid un-necessary wars where possible, due to their experiences. In WW1 France had 8.4 million men mobilised, 1.3 million soldiers killed, 4.2 million soldiers wounded). During WW2 the proportion of the population killed was also far far higher than US casualties, and the entire population had personal experience of warfare.

If George W had not spent his part-time service during the Vietnam War bravely stationed in Texas, he might have been less enthusiastic to have a war using other men's sons.
 
The Americans still today have far better equipment than the brits, its just the people that are using it are numb skulls. Ask any foreign solder who they would wont to go to war with and they will all say the same "The Britsh armed forces".
We maybe under equiped but with the little we have we can beat anyone (the british armed forces have yet to lose a war that they entered into). :D
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top