This is what the Left and BBC do.

Current negotiations are a little different to that, plans involving land swaps. From what I've read it seems talks are about 6% of West Bank being given to Israel, with a far larger amount being donated by Jordan to Palestine with Jordan agreeing to Disarm Palestinians and take on responsibility for defence whilst accepting Israel will carry out strikes in retaliation for terrorism.
Gaza is a problem because the population doubles every 20 years which is unsustainable, Gaza would need to be expanded by 2 - 3 times into Egypt, for which Israel would compensate Egypt by giving them a strip of land extending along the full Israel/Egypt border.

That hasn't aged well.
 
Current negotiations are a little different to that, plans involving land swaps. From what I've read it seems talks are about 6% of West Bank being given to Israel, with a far larger amount being donated by Jordan to Palestine with Jordan agreeing to Disarm Palestinians and take on responsibility for defence whilst accepting Israel will carry out strikes in retaliation for terrorism.
Gaza is a problem because the population doubles every 20 years which is unsustainable, Gaza would need to be expanded by 2 - 3 times into Egypt, for which Israel would compensate Egypt by giving them a strip of land extending along the full Israel/Egypt border.
they talk about genocide, but there could be more Palestinians in Gaza now than before they attacked Israel nearly 3 years ago
 
Have you bothered checking? Or did you just say what you plucked from out of the air? :rolleyes:


The headline reads:
Aljazeera - hardly a solid source of news

no one will know how many people live there the entire infrastructure has been destroyed. - but going off historical birth rates then yes the population will have likely increased
 
Aljazeera - hardly a solid source of news
That'll be why I added a more neutral source. I knew genocide supporters would not accept Al JAzeera's reporters' comments.

no one will know how many people live there the entire infrastructure has been destroyed. -
And we don't know how many or who are still buried under that rubble.


but going off historical birth rates then yes the population will have likely increased
You're sticking with your imagination over genuine tallies.
That's to be expected. :rolleyes:

It's been explained before in this forum that you can't just extrapolate birth rates to arrive at an accurate figure. :rolleyes:
There's no such thing as a straight line projection on birth rates. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised that anyone is still shocked to find that the BBC tells lies at this point!
 
BBC at it again...
"During last night's Newsnight, we covered the murder of Henry Nowak and the political reaction to the case, including discussing Nigel Farage's comments about 'pure, cold rage'. However I referred to 'white cold rage'.

"This was a mistake on my part, a misremembering of the quote. It didn't change the content of the interview but I should have got the quote right. I apologise to Nigel Farage for this."

Chorley gave the wrong quote on camera three times during the interview with Badenoch.

3 TIMES !!! - he misremembered --3 times. Farages 'pure, cold rage" has been repeated over and over again how could he have "misremembered" he has undone all the "hard work" the left has put into his school day alleged remarks from those people who seemed to have no trouble not misremembering something over 40 years ago.
 
'''''The episode has been removed from BBC iPlayer and BBC Sounds, and an apology will be broadcast on Wednesday's edition of Newsnight.'''''

What about the wasted money producing this swaddle .

Does Matt still get paid for his time ?
 
Back
Top