I disagree. If the rest of the world can't be arsed to defend their crucial trade routes. **** 'em.
You mean the free flowing trades routes Donald Trump rendered impassable by his war?If the rest of the world can't be arsed to defend their crucial trade routes. **** 'em.

A senile American President in charge of the worlds largest military force, and an Israeli war mongerer, both desperate to stay out of prison are much more dangerous.If anything I think it will be the other way around. Countries like Saudi will be delighted to see the back of Iran, not sure which others, as I said none of them were expecting to be attacked in the way they have and as we know, there's nothing more dangerous than an angry Arab.
It's Trump and Netanyahu's fault that the Hormuz strait is blocked. Those two idiotic old criminals should have foresaw the obvious.I disagree. If the rest of the world can't be arsed to defend their crucial trade routes. **** 'em.
Do you really want a middle ease armyI disagree. If the rest of the world can't be arsed to defend their crucial trade routes. **** 'em.
You do realise most of the Middle East is Islammic.. And our allies. Be careful what you wish for. Negotiation is precisely what is needed. Netin yahoos attacks are the most expensive election manifesto in history. Now is the best time to negotiate.You cannot negotiate with islam, all talk about reaching an agreement is laughable. A war against islam is a just war, all the world's civilised countries should be together in destroying it.
![]()
The West should double down on the Iran war
Donald Trump may be the volatile leader of an unstable coalition. America’s numerous interventions in the Middle East may have been marked by chaos, inconstancy and the erosion of western prestige. Nato, and even more so the European Union, may be militarily anaemic and economically sclerotic...spectator.com