• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

What's the monarchy for?

No he isn't, the King is a traitor, as was his mother in some ways.
Treason, you’re lucky it no longer attracts the Deathpen.
Charles has the constitutional duty to remove a treachorous government, but he has not removed them,
Borris lied to Her Majesty and Parliament , let’s start with him. Any Leaver who accepted Russsian money is treasonous IMO. Let’s start with a public inquiry.
just like QE2 did not remove Blair, Cameron and the rest of them.
That’s an argument for dictatorship not democracy
It is obvious that Charles prefers the islamic and Communist ways of doing things over British traditions.
Being open to other cultures and influences is not preferring anything, otherwise you would be speaking German
We absolutely should have a monarchy, and a King, ruling things, for all eternity- just not the current one, or any of his family.
You’re describing a puppet monarch at best.
 
I remember my history teacher saying in the 1960s it's not the power they hold but the power they prevent others from holding, perhaps he foresaw the likes of TACO??
 
How are they a corruption of the 'democratic process'?
Modern democracy is a corruption of the Greek ideal for only an aristocracy having the vote - a system that didn't change until the 1830s in this country.
They have unfair, unearned and opaque access to the PM and wider government. The level and type of access they have would be a government ending scandal for anyone except the royal family.

And the only reason they have that power is because that's how we've always done things. That's not good enough.
 
How are they a corruption of the 'democratic process'?

1) They sit at the apex of a pyramid of ranks, precedences and privileges. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_precedence_in_England_and_Wales

"Your Majesty" outranks "Your Royal Highness" which outranks "Your Highness" which outranks "Your Grace" which outranks "My Lord", and so on and so forth, descending through all the various tiers of Knighthoods, (diverting on the way for people like the Lord Lieutenants) until you get to the bottom layer of ordinary citizens.

Depending on which layer you're born into (or appointed to by greasing palms or helping politicians in various ways) you end up having disproportionate influence, or actual unelected legislative power.

Traditionally, the British nobility rank directly below the British royal family. In the modern era, this ranking is more of a formally recognised social dignity, rather than something conveying practical authority; however, through bodies such as the House of Lords, the nature of some offices in the Royal Household, and British property law, the British nobility retain some aspects of political and legal power.

Did you know that there are only two countries in the world which reserve seats in their legislatures for unelected representatives of the state religion?

Iran and the UK.


2) They secretly and privately influence our "democratically elected" governments to act in their own personal interests.


Government documents that “relate to” communications with the sovereign or the next two persons in line to the throne, as well as palace officials acting on their behalf, are subject to an absolute exemption from release under freedom of information or by government archives.

3) Governments seeking to impose their will on our democratically elected representatives in Parliament will use the same out-of-band channels to get the monarch to act in their own partisan interests.


And I'm sure we all remember this:

 
Oh dear, more insults. You are not doing too well at this are you

It's not an insult.

You were the one insulting me by saying that I would argue against something you believe just for the sake of arguing, not because of a genuine belief on my part.

I'm simply observing the only logical conclusion to draw from that about your mindset
 
It's not an insult.

You were the one insulting me by saying that I would argue against something you believe just for the sake of arguing, not because of a genuine belief on my part.

I'm simply observing the only logical conclusion to draw from that about your mindset
No I didn't?
 
Why insult me it's just my opinion on the royal family, do you stamp your feet and always get your own way in normal life?

What I said was absolutely nothing to do with your opinion on the Royal Family, and absolutely everything to do with your insulting claim that
I would argue against something you believe just for the sake of arguing, not because of a genuine belief on my part.

I'm simply observing the only logical conclusion to draw from that about your mindset
 
So, you like the monarchy but have no idea what powers they have and the influence they make use of.

It really is just about the bunting for you.
Think what ya like insult me all you like, I'll still like the royals (y)
 
Back
Top