• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Why is Badenough not speaking the truth?

Status
Not open for further replies.
motorbiking said:
No what’s happening is the usual forum idiots are trying to stir up the hatred by implying child sex offenders are over represented by white british men.
Click to expand...
Over represented? Which forum idiot keeps saying that? :confused:

motorbiking said:
I will however correct the forum idiots who falsely want to pretend that child sex abuse gangs are over represented among white british men.
Click to expand...
Ahh, The Chief Forum Idiot keeps saying it.

Back to the topic you lied about...

New figures from the police database show that, where ethnicity data was available, 85% of “group-based” child abusers were white in the first three quarters of 2024.

Offences where grooming gangs are involved are predominantly white. There is not a significant issue here with any particular ethnicity or setting
Click to expand...
Richard Fewkes, NPCC
The same data for the whole of 2023 showed 83% of offenders were white.



Read more.
 
If there is a full and thorough public inquiry into the grooming gangs, it will focus far more on the ethnicity of the perps and ignore the previous advice of Labour MP Naz Shah and the likes of Owen Jones who said (or re-tweeted) “Those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of diversity.”

The inquiry will examine how Pakistani men with dual citizenship were able, after early prison release, allowed to renounce their Pakistani citizenship to avoid deportation.

The inquiry will examine how Pakistan, who receives state aid from the UK, was allowed to refuse the return of Pakistani deportees.

It's going to be very interesting, very interesting indeed.

Thank you Elon Musk, we owe you a debt of gratitude.
 
fillyboy said:
The inquiry will....
Click to expand...


You have in mind a hypothetical inquiry.

So it's premature of you to guess what its scope might be.

Why do you think Badenough is lying about the real one, which has actually been completed and a report issued, with recommendations that need to be enacted?
 
noseall said:
No, it really doesn't.

I have read it.

3.3.3 Ethnicity Children on child protection plans under the primary category of sexual abuse on 31 March 2023 were more likely to be from White (White British or ‘White other’) backgrounds than the population of children attending English state schools and nurseries, or than the children placed on child protection plans for other reasons (see Figure 7). While 13% of children attending state schools and nurseries were from Asian backgrounds, only 8% of children placed on child protection plans because of sexual abuse were Asian; similarly, Black children made up 6% of the state school and nursery population but 3% of children placed on child protection plans because of sexual abuse. Research has highlighted the difficulties that professionals face in identifying sexual abuse and acting on concerns about children from minority ethnic backgrounds (Ali et al, 2021; Rodger et al, 2020), while also concluding that the likelihood of being sexually abused does not vary significantly between ethnic groups (Bebbington et al, 2011). Figure 6. Children on child protection plans and children in need at 31 March 2022, by sex, England

It talks about the children (victims of abuse)...??? :confused:

Still baffled. I wonder if Old Dementia can clear this up?
Click to expand...
If you ignore a large sample in your data what do you think it does to your data.

Child protection orders usually protect the child from family members. Not organised gangs.
 
Was she telling the truth when she admitted the painfully obvious: Brexit was an act of wilful negligence by a government that dragged Britain out of its most important trading relationship “before we had a plan for growth outside the EU”. There wasn’t a considered Plan B, just a government frantically trying to catch itself up as it went along....Successive Conservative governments dating back to David Cameron’s had promised to get immigration down but hadn’t thought through how to do that either, she pointed out, and consequently achieved the opposite...They bound themselves in law to achieving net zero by 2050 but only worried afterwards about how exactly they might do it. Each time, she conceded, Conservative governments told voters what they wanted to hear and gambled on working it all out later.
 
motorbiking said:
If you ignore a large sample in your data what do you think it does to your data.

Child protection orders usually protect the child from family members. Not organised gangs.
Click to expand...
Great. Back to the subject:
What has reading a paragraph regards the ethnicity of child victims got to do with any it?
You still haven't explained?
 
noseall said:
Great. Back to the subject:
What has reading a paragraph regards the ethnicity of child victims got to do with any it?
You still haven't explained?
Click to expand...
The report is focused on child sexual abuse. A much broader remit than the topics discussed in the two threads.

Most child sexual abuse (once you remove pedo image networks) and statutory rape (sex with a minor and a young adult). You are left with a large number of “in the family” crimes.

Is it therefore not obvious to you that if these are significantly under reported in certain groups. You are missing the picture.

Not that the report you keep trying to rely on has much relevance to the topic of these discussions.

But you persist - dishonestly, stubbornly, or stupidly - I don’t really care about your motive.
 
motorbiking said:
The report is focused on child sexual abuse. A much broader remit than the topics discussed in the two threads.
Click to expand...


Is there some reason why you want to avoid mention of child sexual abuse in general?

Is that the same reason you are determined to avoid the question "why is Badenough not speaking the truth?"
 
JohnD said:
Is there some reason why you want to avoid mention of child sexual abuse in general?
Click to expand...
Read this and educate yourself


I'm not interested in parking tickets and drunk drivers in an argument about speeding.

Child sexual abuse is a very broad category of offences. The vast majority of convictions are illegal explicit image possession. "Consenting" sex between a 15 year old and a 16 year old is also included. Unlawful gay sex due to age of consent is also included.

These have nothing to do with organised gangs trafficking children as prostitutes.
 
motorbiking said:
I'm not interested in parking tickets and drunk drivers in an argument about speeding.
Click to expand...

You are determined to avoid Badenough's false claims in a thread about Badenough not speaking the truth.

But you are very keen to post lots and lots of diversions.

So it's you that wants to talk about (one thing) in a thread about (something else).

So yes, you ARE interested in diversion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top