That'd be a very interesting retaliation response. No loss of life so being more restrained and responsible than Israel. Which is not what you expect.
I wonder what's on the boat?
Booze ( ?)
That'd be a very interesting retaliation response. No loss of life so being more restrained and responsible than Israel. Which is not what you expect.
I wonder what's on the boat?
Strait of Hormuz so might be containers from India to the Arab states or the other way round.I wonder what's on the boat
Well yes, but it doesn't tend to go in containers.I believe the strait carries some oil.
Well yes but Iran at times has threatened to shut the strait down.Well yes, but it doesn't tend to go in containers.
Strange how that it was noted as being against international law, but not so with israel's strike on a foreign embassy in a third country...It seems Iran has seized an Israeli owned container ship.
Strange how that was noted as being against international law, but no so with israel's strike on a foreign embassy in a third country...
Which is also against international law!
Comes under Vienna laws filly. Also it seems it was the consulate not that this matters.The Embassy in Damascus?
Not really worth posting up (several times) then.No, not possible.
Egypt takes US aid. Jordan, Quatar, Saudi Jordan and the Emirates as far as I know don't. The Abraham Accord got them all talking to Israel but there seems to be another factor as well. A Palestine state needed for them to fully accept Israel. Iraq - pass but some time ago their gov broke down. Looks like an NI type set up was established and it broke down. Syria well it's Syria. It needs money and will accept any that provide it. No takers as far as I am aware.All fine n' dandy sentiments but i see the dogs of war are slipping the leash and wonder if America has the diplomatic power to reduce tensions in the middle-east - Egypt, Jordan and Qatar are doing their best but all their efforts have made little difference since Christmas.