Zion and the Art of Armageddon

Status
Not open for further replies.
I won’t be replying to you again
Of course you won’t…because you’ve been caught out

Just for everybody here, so it is clear for everybody to see:



1) Nwgs2 claims he does not condone the actions of Israel nor Palestine, however

2) Nwgs2 is unable to say he doesn’t support Netanyahus actions in Gaza

3) Nwgs2 refuses to denounce Israel’s endless bombings of innocent Palestinian women and children in Gaza



It is very clear Nwgs2 does support the actions of Netanyahu and his government, but won’t admit it.
 
IMG_8484.png
 
Starmer does…
Yes Starmer does call for immediate ceasefires in Gaza and Lebanon, and for the removal of all restrictions on humanitarian aid into Gaza and a recommitment to the two state solution.

Unlike Nwgs2 who fully supports all the actions of the Israel government
 
In 2019 they were (officially) supposed to be shooting people's feet off.


Obviously this order was not followed. They prefer to cause more serious disability and more deaths shooting the knees.

Supporters of Israel's genocide like to pretend it only started a year ago.
 
AlJ have just run a campaign against the west's main media sources and reporting. They say they follow their gov's stance so some reporters resigned. Well they will report the gov's stance. I have gained the impression that this was more apparent in the US than here.

However they found a BBC journalist who had resigned. Curious given Israel's view of the BBC. It's a fact that the gov's view got more air time until more info came out which they do their best to verify.

The sticking point seems to be no mention of the word genocide. In fact footage shown from some source or the other where the interviewer asked the interviewed to avoid the word. The court hearing has to be considered - did they say genocide was actually taking place - no. In fact at that time pundits pointe out that it would take them significant time to do that. A hearing of a different type to prove guilt. Not that I feel that Israel is currently doing themselves much good in this area but would an IC's decision have any effect - in some countries no.

Meanwhile I think there is little doubt that Lebanon actions are about to step up. Many evacuation orders and now an odd ball. Strip of coast declared as a military zone. Odd as it's not their country. They indicate there will be attacks from the sea. Sound familiar? Have to wait and see. Benjamin has mentioned being on a sacred mission. All his wars.

Iran has come up with it's own retaliation plan for if Israel does. It could get extremely messy in terms of what they intend to attack. They appear to be discussing this plan with the Arab states. Threatening - I suspect so but pass.
 
The sticking point seems to be no mention of the word genocide
It’s not really appropriate to use the word genocide unless it’s been legally declared.

genocide is the widespread killing of a group with the intention of destroying it. Has Israel been doing that in Gaza, I’m not sure that is the case, it’s certainly in that direction
 
This was long before the current troubles. I wonder what sparked last October's attack?

Israeli terrorists in uniform were shooting unarmed Palestinians for years beforehand

"The sound of a single gunshot echoes around the street as a man in a white t-shirt runs away from where an Israeli military jeep has been sighted.

In that instant, blood is seen spraying above him and he collapses forwards.

Ameed al-Jaghoub, unarmed and apparently rushing to help a wounded man, had been shot in the back of the head during an Israeli raid in the occupied West Bank village of Beita."


"Beita found itself at the heart of the West Bank's escalating violence in May 2021, when an Israeli settler group established the nearby outpost of Evyatar, cutting off the Palestinian village from part of its lands.

The settlers built the outpost in apparent retribution for the murder of Yehuda Guetta, a 19-year-old yeshiva student, who was shot dead by a Palestinian-American who came from a town 20km (12 miles) away from Beita.

All settlements are illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this. But outposts like Evyatar, which often involve taking privately-owned Palestinian land, are also illegal under Israeli law.

In the year after Evyatar's establishment, Israeli forces killed nine Palestinians, eight of them from Beita, during weekly protests against the outpost, according to the Israel-based human rights group B'Tselem."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top