Zuckerberg, Trump, Musk. The truth.
- Thread starter Mottie
- Start date
You can’t "literally" prove that something in the future is or is not going to happen. You gan guess, you can cross your fingers and hope, you can make a wish but what you can’t do is "literally" prove something that is yet to happen.
I literally can prove it because Trump did it in 2016-2020
"stupidity is doing the same thing again and again, expecting different results"
by the way putting up tariffs literally increases prices...............it cant do anything else.
I am sorry you keep being wrong how embarrassing for you, best quit whilst you are so far behind
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,957
- Reaction score
- 3,100
- Country
But they aren't all felons and rapists. if fact, I can only think of one...
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 18,570
- Reaction score
- 1,585
- Country
Trumps too I hope
Trumps Project 2025 government cuts are causing job losses in Red states
Buyers remorse is setting in fast
eu.usatoday.com
Buyers remorse is setting in fast
President Donald Trump is busy shrinking government with massive cuts that also impact Republican states. The GOP is starting to notice
Congressional Republicans worry about Trump's cuts at home, but barely speak up | Opinion
What will it take for Republican lawmakers to stop their states from being decimated by Trump's cuts?
eu.usatoday.com
Now you're talking sense.
His are probably in there somewhere, he will readjust them am and give himself a multibilion tax rebate.
All part of the job description.
What like voting for British political parties.
- Joined
- 22 Aug 2006
- Messages
- 7,070
- Reaction score
- 1,193
- Country
I wrote "in his estimation", doughnut.
What he's saying could work out OK, It probably won't, but all you do is sound off that it can't, and you're wrong.
It appears to be because you only have the one same prejudiced a priori approach to everything.
That means your assessments aren't objective, and your premature conclusions preclude any other outcome than the one you want to rail against to support the colour of your flag.
All you ever seem to want to say is that wealth creators being better off starves the poor, because it suits your one track mind and mantra.
It doesn't have to be like that.
Have a look at Sweden maybe, with its wider wealth disparity than the US.
If you think you have presented "evidence", you're not using your nut, old fruit.
All you do is drown yourself deeper in the mire.
Getting off-topic rhetoric from biased sources and calling it evidence, is indeed, I submit, crap.
Here you go, here's some "evidence". It seems to be written by an idiot, but we're used to that.
It counters most of what you say. That proves you're all wrong, nya nya. ?
Don't delude yourself before the start, that's how it works.
Last edited:
