Instead of locking threads,, just ban Rogue Hanger the troll

Rutger Hauer has already warned you not to type until you have engaged your brain. Please listen!

Pack it in, Sir Arthur, you're making me laugh.

I like this quote fom Sir Arthur, appropriate, don't you think:
Being born in a stable does not make one a horse.
Sir Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington
 
Sponsored Links
That's about 60% of them arrested. More numbers for you.

Where are your numbers? OOh I forgot. Silly me.
You don't do numbers..

Evidently, although you try, you don't do numbers very well. :LOL: :LOL:
In fact, you do them so badly, you're in no position to judge others.

I'm inclined to ask you whether you think it's 1 in 3 or 60%, but you'd probably not know the difference. :LOL: :LOL:

Ooh, I forgot, Silly me. You just pluck numbers out of the air and challenge others to disprove them. :rolleyes:
 
It's got fook all to do with race RH. It is about an identifiable section of the community behaving in a way that isn't acceptable. Why do you think it is a race issue? It's about importing benefit scroungers. Whether they are Chinese or Australian or Romanian makes no odds - we just don't want them. Gedditt yet? (I doubt that he does) :rolleyes:
 
"For me, the official reports showing that immigration has been good for UK, is sufficient"

Linky?

What liberal pro immigration establishment did these reports come from?

You've not been keeping up. Have you, Norcon?
You want me to do your revision for you?

Sory, you'll have to re-read the pevious seventeen pages. (I've done that number in words, 'cos I know the difficulty you're having with figures. :LOL: :LOL: )
 
Sponsored Links
"For me, the official reports showing that immigration has been good for UK, is sufficient"

Linky?

What liberal pro immigration establishment did these reports come from?

You've not been keeping up. Have you, Norcon?
You want me to do your revision for you?

Sory, you'll have to re-read the pevious seventeen pages. (I've done that number in words, 'cos I know the difficulty you're having with figures. :LOL: :LOL: )

Linky linky.
:LOL:
 
What's the matter?
Afraid it won't stand up too scrutiny?
 
It's got fook all to do with race RH. It is about an identifiable section of the community
You obviously don't understand the term "discrimination".
The unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people. Oxford Dictionary
Discrimination is the practice of treating one person or group of people less fairly or less well than other people or groups. Collins Dictionary
You want more?

Who mentioned race? Although the Roma are an identifiable ethnicity, I believe.


behaving in a way that isn't acceptable.
You sometimes behave in a way that isn't acceptable, but I don't automatically assume that everyone called joe is unacceptable.


Why do you think it is a race issue?
Why do you?
Discimination, prejudice is not just about race.


It's about importing benefit scroungers. Whether they are Chinese or Australian or Romanian makes no odds -
Who's doing the importing? The EU is about free movement of goods and people. I'm all for it. Benefit scroungers exist in all societies and are not wanted anywhere. That's understandable and why the governments of various EU countries legislate to reduce the scrounging.

we just don't want them. Gedditt yet? (I doubt that he does) :rolleyes:
The scroungers are not wanted anywhere. But they have a right to be anywhere in the EU. They don't have a right to benefits anywhere in the EU, contrary to some TV programmes and the doom-sayers amongst us. Thay only have that right to benefits in their host country. You want to take away that right, or deal with scroungers of all sorts? I'm all for supporting governments that take action to reduce the scrounging.

To take away the right of Roma Gypsies to travel would entail one's ID to record one's ethnicity. (Only 2% of Romanians are Roma Gypsies) and to deny that right to that ethnicity even though their fellow countrymen have that right. That's a dangerous path to take, joe. Do you want to take that path? gedditt yet? (I doubt that he understands his own proposals)

Edit: Sorry, It's 3.3% of Romanians are Roma Gypsies.
 
What's the matter?
Afraid it won't stand up too scrutiny?

Don't be daft, you don't have the ability to scrutinise a response before making another fallacious claim.

Please continue with your ludicrous claims. Your inability to read and assimilate responses means it's not worth my while typing 'em.
 
"The scroungers are not wanted anywhere."

rogues own words.
Now he finally admits they are not wanted. :LOL:
 
What's the matter?
Afraid it won't stand up too scrutiny?

Don't be daft, you don't have the ability to scrutinise a response before making another fallacious claim.

Please continue with your ludicrous claims. Your inability to read and assimilate responses means it's not worth my while typing 'em.

Your the one making fallacious claims and have no evidence to back it up.
Put up or shut up.
 
"The scroungers are not wanted anywhere."

rogues own words.
Now he finally admits they are not wanted. :LOL:

You're totally off your trolley. Where did I ever suggest that scoungers are wanted?

My apologies for describing you as a "half-wit. I was obviously over-estimating you.

No wonder you mis-quote facts and figures, You're unable to assimilate anything you read.
 
You're a pro immigration loon. Nuff said.
Where were you born?
Are you froggie born and bred?
 
Where were you born?

WTF? Are you just making polite conversation now? Or do you want to racially abuse me?

Or are you thinking that my place of birth somehow influences my perception of society?
Naaah, You wouldn't do that. I'm confident that you don't have the intelligence to think that much.
 
froggies don't care about the lowlifes they pass on at the docks to cross the channel to the UK. As long as they are off froggie soil!

Just wondering if you are in that nationality category.
But I reckon you are given the drivel you post and the lack of evidence you have to back up your claims.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top