Just popping in…..

[JohnD]

I said it costs us /you £125 a night to put up a migrant in a hotel and provided a link.

You say migrant.

You mean refugee.

 

[Notch7]

I said it costs us /you £125 a night to put up a migrant in a hotel and provided a link.
What a treat that would be for our own Homeless people setting up for the night in a shop doorway in a town near you

So you are against this governments endless cuts on public services like mental healthcare, council houses, universal credit etc that are a primary cause of homelessness.

Or do you vote Tory to have more inequality?

 

[AngleEyes]

FFS you utter hair-splitting thicko.

Temper, temper.
But I'm pleased to see yu've resorted to abuse, It indicates that you've exhausted rational argument, and your argument was so fragile anyway.

post was about the living accommodation of asylum seekers and refugees. As was mine in reply to his. It was **** all to do with "Just popping in" was it?

JohnD's post was about refugees in UK, and disproving Hairymelon's claim. It was **** all to do with refugees accommodation in other countries. Neither had any other post been about accommodation in other countries.

 

[AngleEyes]

If someone called you a bigot, report them for trolling.

What about if someone called you a "hair-splitting thicko"?

FFS you utter hair-splitting thicko.

 

[AngleEyes]

It’s about how left leaning this forum is. As can be witnessed, anyone posting with a legitimate beef against a topic that the left, arrogantly, claim the moral high ground on, will be insulted and attacked falsely, as a person with a problem with foreign people just to end the debate.

It’s about how right leaning this forum is. As can be witnessed, anyone posting with a credible evidence to disprove the unsubstantiated beef against a topic that the right, arrogantly, claim the moral high ground on, will be insulted and attacked falsely, as a person with a problem with sanity, intelligence, etc, just to end the debate.

 

[AngleEyes]

I said it costs us /you £125 a night to put up a migrant in a hotel and provided a link.

You said it costs £125 for every immigrant.

£125 a night for every one in a hotel.

JohnD posted proof that your claim was incorrect, I called it bigoted because you changed the narrative in the article, which said some asylum seekers. You changed it to suggest every immigrant costs £125 per night to accommodate.
​

That's not the fault of the immigrant. That's the fault of a UK government's broken system.

 

[AngleEyes]

I said it costs us /you £125 a night to put up a migrant in a hotel and provided a link.
What a treat that would be for our own Homeless people setting up for the night in a shop doorway in a town near you

Again, it's the fault of the UK's broken systems.
The UK is obligated under international agreements to provide accommodation for asylum seekers (not for immigrants, there's a difference of which you are either unaware, or ignore).
The UK is not obligated to provide accommodation for homeless, so they don't. If you think they should be, why not vote for a party that is more likely to provide such resource?

 

[Mottie]

What about if someone called you a "hair-splitting thicko"?

I edited it down for you. I originally typed 'hair-splitting ****'. Both are true so I don't see a problem and I suspect neither do others.

 

[Mottie]

JohnD's post was about refugees in UK, and disproving Hairymelon's claim. It was **** all to do with refugees accommodation in other countries. Neither had any other post been about accommodation in other countries.

And my post was about where those refugees came from. A s hithole forest camp in France. The accommodation provided was far better than what they had been living in.

 

[AngleEyes]

I edited it down for you. I originally typed 'hair-splitting ****'. Both are true so I don't see a problem and I suspect neither do others.

Your opinion is not automatically true, despite you thinking and claiming it is.

 

[AngleEyes]

And my post was about where those refugees came from. A s hithole forest camp in France.

Which was completely off-topic. Something you very recently complained about others doing the same.
In fact you suggested reporting off-topic posts.
Yours wouldn't last long.

Our differing opinions does indicate how the claim that a post is off-topic is purely subjective.

 

[Mottie]

Your opinion is not automatically true, despite you thinking and claiming it is.

So you say but I'm still waiting for someone other than you to say you're not a 'hair splitting ****'. I won't hold my breath.

 

[AngleEyes]

So you say but I'm still waiting for someone other than you to say you're not a 'hair splitting ****'. I won't hold my breath.

Take a poll if you like, it still doesn't have any validity.

 

[Mottie]

Take a poll if you like, it still doesn't have any validity.

Any supporters for the hair-splitting **** formerly known as Angle out there? Helloooo! Anybody? Nobody? Oh well.....

 

[AngleEyes]

Any supporters for the hair-splitting **** formerly known as Angle out there? Helloooo! Anybody? Nobody? Oh well.....

You appear to endow them with superhuman foresight, being able to respond to your polling before you've posted it.
Does that indicate how much high regard you have for them?