9/11 and all that........

Sponsored Links
Absolutely. Couldn't agree more. You and I speak with one voice on this......
 
I always found Fred Dibnah to be a little right wing. Did anyone actually see his body??
 
Sponsored Links
is this it ?

Fred%20Dibnah.JPG
 
ninebob said:
This: http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm is worth a look as well for those who haven't already seen it.

Nine. Good viewing, but me & Mrs Secure both came to the same conclusion: where's the plane?

I said if the plane crashed at the P, where were the remains...

She said, if the plane didn't crash at the P, where did it crash?
 
Weren't both planes completely "absorbed" as it were by the WTC towers - i.e it didn't come out of the other side and I presume disintegrated pretty well. The other pictures where there were remnants were of normal planes crashes - i.e. accidents where I presume that the pilots did as much as they could to lessen the impacts. With all these I guess the planes were at full tilt going towards their targets. Not saying it couldn't have been a missile/smaller jet, but comparing the Pentagon scene with those others isn't really like for like.

What wouldn't surpise me though is the one they say the passengers took down - well it wouldn't have been too hard to "manage" that one so it didn't hit anything too important / densley populated on the ground.
 
Not at full tilt - no need -- large engine portions made it through and onto surrounding streets... I bet a rotor-disc or two would have come 'tight' had it nudged a human being or three.

BTW When a fighter 'escorts' a plane to a landing site ... Would he shoot the thing down - over say, London?? Answer 'yes !' The rogue plane may target Parliament or Buck house, so a few hundred or so plebs do not matter in the grand scheme of things.
We, as a community have just put the 'arm' on Bristol Inter', incoming aircraft no longer descend over us onto finals.. Near important city you see !!

:(
 
chilluk said:
Weren't both planes completely "absorbed" as it were by the WTC towers - i.e it didn't come out of the other side and I presume disintegrated pretty well. .

The WTC method of construction (which contributed to its inevitable collapse) was unusual, being a forest of steel legs round the perimeter of the building (on the outside) with no pillars on the floors. The floors were hung on these legs like the bed of a trampoline, and each floor had insufficient strength to support for long another floor collapsing onto it, even if the steel brackets had not softened in the fire after their plasterboard cladding was knocked off by the impact.

So I suppose the plane crashed into and through the equivalent of some hefty prison bars, which would have mashed it up.

Whatever wreckage penetrated the first side would have been broken up, and hit the second side before it could get out. I imagine a solid object like an engine had more chance of getting through than large bits of wing.
 
So guys-

What happened to the Pentagon plane? Did it actually crash into the P, or, if not, where did it crash?
 
Now that I've been having a good old search about on the webbly regarding the Building 7 conspiracy, apparently the Pentagon Plane conspiracy is seen by the conspiracy fraternity as a lazy fake (and easily debunked) conspiracy by the White House to make it look as if all the conspiracy theories are crazy...... :eek:
 
and we never went to the moon, the ball never crossed the line in 1966, there was a line of snipers from the fbi and cia behind the grassy knoll, mi5 killed diana, aliens landed in roswell etc etc etc


but i tell you one thing i dont believe whilst were on about conspiricies and thats that the guy at the centre of the wmd business (name escapes me at the moment) killed himself
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top