Child protection

Status
Not open for further replies.
You're full of schitt and forever the apologist.
What a wonderful and reasoned response.
I thank you. You prove my point precisely.

The article about the Yemeni bride was in the DM on 9th Sept. It was supported by the phrase: "Activists claimed"
Now which activists would that be?
It was re-reported along with the "fake" photo in the Oregon Herald on 15th Sept in support of christian republican politicians.

Now make your own mind up about it's validitiy.

Amazing.
You're actually dismissing the activists who try to help girls like her.
Your imagination is running wild now and you've gone completely potty.

Says the apologist who dismisses activists trying to prevent child marriages.
 
Sponsored Links
You're full of schitt and forever the apologist.
What a wonderful and reasoned response.
I thank you. You prove my point precisely.

The article about the Yemeni bride was in the DM on 9th Sept. It was supported by the phrase: "Activists claimed"
Now which activists would that be?
It was re-reported along with the "fake" photo in the Oregon Herald on 15th Sept in support of christian republican politicians.

Now make your own mind up about it's validitiy.

Amazing.
You're actually dismissing the activists who try to help girls like her.
Your imagination is running wild now and you've gone completely potty.

Says the apologist who dismisses activists trying to prevent child marriages.
Remember when you kept responding with the comment "strawman"?
Well, this is the correct and appropriate response:
"Strawman!"
You've constructed an argument that you think I've made so you can attack that argument, rather than reason against the real issue.
Plonker.
 
You're full of schitt and forever the apologist.
What a wonderful and reasoned response.
I thank you. You prove my point precisely.

The article about the Yemeni bride was in the DM on 9th Sept. It was supported by the phrase: "Activists claimed"
Now which activists would that be?
It was re-reported along with the "fake" photo in the Oregon Herald on 15th Sept in support of christian republican politicians.

Now make your own mind up about it's validitiy.

Amazing.
You're actually dismissing the activists who try to help girls like her.
Your imagination is running wild now and you've gone completely potty.

Says the apologist who dismisses activists trying to prevent child marriages.
Remember when you kept responding with the comment "strawman"?
Well, this is the correct and appropriate response:
"Strawman!"

Says the apologist who dismisses activists trying to prevent child marriages.
 
You're full of schitt and forever the apologist.
What a wonderful and reasoned response.
I thank you. You prove my point precisely.

The article about the Yemeni bride was in the DM on 9th Sept. It was supported by the phrase: "Activists claimed"
Now which activists would that be?
It was re-reported along with the "fake" photo in the Oregon Herald on 15th Sept in support of christian republican politicians.

Now make your own mind up about it's validitiy.

Amazing.
You're actually dismissing the activists who try to help girls like her.
Your imagination is running wild now and you've gone completely potty.

Says the apologist who dismisses activists trying to prevent child marriages.
Remember when you kept responding with the comment "strawman"?
Well, this is the correct and appropriate response:
"Strawman!"

Says the apologist who dismisses activists trying to prevent child marriages.
Strawman!
You see how silly repitition is?
You've created a new defence against defeat: repitition.
 
Sponsored Links
You're full of schitt and forever the apologist.
What a wonderful and reasoned response.
I thank you. You prove my point precisely.

The article about the Yemeni bride was in the DM on 9th Sept. It was supported by the phrase: "Activists claimed"
Now which activists would that be?
It was re-reported along with the "fake" photo in the Oregon Herald on 15th Sept in support of christian republican politicians.

Now make your own mind up about it's validitiy.

Amazing.
You're actually dismissing the activists who try to help girls like her.
Your imagination is running wild now and you've gone completely potty.

Says the apologist who dismisses activists trying to prevent child marriages.
Remember when you kept responding with the comment "strawman"?
Well, this is the correct and appropriate response:
"Strawman!"

Says the apologist who dismisses activists trying to prevent child marriages.
Strawman!
You see how silly repitition is?

Says the apologist who dismisses activists trying to prevent child marriages.

At this stage if "strawman" is all you got then you are fooked.
 
At this stage if "strawman" is all you got then you are fooked.
Then you may consider me fooked, nocon. It's preferable to trying to hold a discussion with you. Your bullshit has me completely baffled.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top