That will warm the beer nicely.Going by the scale on the right the wires at the bottom are only at 32.7 degrees C
That will warm the beer nicely.Going by the scale on the right the wires at the bottom are only at 32.7 degrees C
Lec, you don't need physics to explain it. ... Where the cable's bent, the electrons have to slow down to go round the corner. ... Thus, they form a queue, jostling and bumping into each other. This is why the cable heats up on bends.
As I think you know, electrons in a conductor don't travel at constant speed in a straight line, they just jump to the next atom.does not some energy have to be expended in order to persuade an electron (which has mass) to do something other than travel at constant speed in a straight line? Mind you, considerations of quantum physics probably screw that all up!
Yes, that's true. As I said, I was just trying (clearly not hard enough!) to think of a way of 'being clever'As I think you know, electrons in a conductor don't travel at constant speed in a straight line, they just jump to the next atom.
Maybe, but there are two sides to any bend, and the opportunity for convection loss might increase on one side when it decreases on the other - but that, too, is probably 'trying to be too clever'!However, I think the reason for the higher temperature is simply the localised increase in ambient temperature reducing the ability of the cable to convect heat.
Won't the convection (as well as radiation) loss also be different (even with the same ambient temp on both sides of bend) because of the different surface area? Increasing the size of a CH 'radiator' will result in more heat 'loss' by both radiation and convection, won't it?I'd expect the ambient temperature to be about equal either side of the bend, hence convection loss will be the same. Now for radiated heat loss you have a point.
Not necessarily changed overall, but the surface area on the outside of the bend will surely have to have increased and/or that on the inside of the bend decreased - is that not the nature of bends?But if you consider say a 12" length of cable, the surface area hasn't increased if it is bent.
Indeed - and, ideally (probably not possible!) a better photo!RF, give us some more clues!
Does this help?
Indeed.However (never thought of this before!), 'trying to be clever' and thinking of the physics (particularly Newton's laws), does not some energy have to be expended in order to persuade an electron (which has mass) to do something other than travel at constant speed in a straight line? Mind you, considerations of quantum physics probably screw that all up!
Try to keep up BAS!As I think you know, electrons in a conductor don't travel at constant speed in a straight line, they just jump to the next atom.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local