Stuart Hall

Last I knew he was living in Wilmslow, He may have moved since then though.
 
Sponsored Links
bet he will be out in about 6 mths if not less.

just because of his age,still a precedent has now been set,how many of the others will get lenient sentences???
 
Probably because all the judiciary are kiddie fiddlers too, :rolleyes:
 
Sponsored Links
Ken Barlow is next, his brief said he's..." looking forward to defending his self"...I bet he is....not.
 
Not sure what jailing him achieves really. Not in any way apologising for what he did, or taking anything away from his victims, but jail is supposed to be a punishment and deterrent, well the deterrent bit is not really applicable in this case. I feel a more sensible punishment would be appropriate.
 
EddieM said:
Not sure what jailing him achieves really. Not in any way apologising for what he did, or taking anything away from his victims, but jail is supposed to be a punishment and deterrent, well the deterrent bit is not really applicable in this case. I feel a more sensible punishment would be appropriate.
Click to expand...

You could use that argument for any criminal offence, and we would not then have any prisons. And what sanctions would we have then against criminal behaviour?
 
tony1851 said:
EddieM said:
Not sure what jailing him achieves really. Not in any way apologising for what he did, or taking anything away from his victims, but jail is supposed to be a punishment and deterrent, well the deterrent bit is not really applicable in this case. I feel a more sensible punishment would be appropriate.
Click to expand...

You could use that argument for any criminal offence, and we would not then have any prisons. And what sanctions would we have then against criminal behaviour?
Click to expand...



Sharia law?? :confused: :confused:
 
tony1851 said:
EddieM said:
Not sure what jailing him achieves really. Not in any way apologising for what he did, or taking anything away from his victims, but jail is supposed to be a punishment and deterrent, well the deterrent bit is not really applicable in this case. I feel a more sensible punishment would be appropriate.
Click to expand...

You could use that argument for any criminal offence, and we would not then have any prisons. And what sanctions would we have then against criminal behaviour?
Click to expand...

Well, I agree to an extent, but I don't like the idea of forking out thousands of taxpayers money for no change, he's very unlikely to re-offend, however I completely agree he needs punishment though.
 
how much tax payers money has it cost to keep brady and hindley since 1966?
hanging was abolished late 65, what a shame.
bring back Albert Pierpoint.....I wish.
 
amstel said:
how much tax payers money has it cost to keep brady and hindley since 1966?
hanging was abolished late 65, what a shame.
bring back Albert Pierpoint.....I wish.
Click to expand...

who concluded that "capital punishment was not a deterrent"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sponsored Links

Similar threads

C
Taking the pi$$
Replies
7
Views
507
matt1e
M
E
"sex by surprise"...
Replies
6
Views
907
^woody^
^woody^
A
Stuart Turner pump problem
Replies
5
Views
1K
just pumps
J
JohnD
Philip Green in the news again
Replies
0
Views
362
JohnD
JohnD
N
Neg head stuart turner pump - no water
Replies
1
Views
451
notevenadiyer
N
Back
Top