Ok, I'm no plumber, and that's probably not the ideal way to start a post when contradicting someone in the plumbing forum, but I also agree with all those who think that doitall is wrong.
If the cylinder is on the ground floor, the top of the cylinder is say 4m below the tank, so the head at that point is 0.4bar.
Ok, so before we go any further, every metre of head = 0.1bar assumed difference in pressure, for the sake of your example at least. No problem.
Now run a hot pipe to the 1st floor and the head at the outlet is now 0.2bar, if you stick a shower rose on the wall the head will be shall we say 0.1 bar.
So, presumably, the shower head in the example must be 3 metres above the HW tank, which also means that it must be 1 metre below the bottom of the CWS tank, as we're saying there's 4 metres of head between CWS and HW tank. I have no problem with your theory here, 1 metre = 0.1bar pressure at the shower head.
Now bring the cylinder up a floor, and the head at the top of the cylinder is now 0.2 bar, and shall we say a maximum 20 Ltrs/mim, as you say physics head x pipe size = flow.
Still with you here, as we're assuming 2 metres floor to ceiling height, so distance from bottom of CWS tank to top of HW tank is now approximately 2 metres, hence 0.2bar AT the HW tank outlet.
Now run a pipe from the cylinder to the kitchen, the head does not increase, and neither will the maximum flow from the cylinder.
Still with me.
No, this is where I'm not with you. I can't fathom how you've come to this conclusion, but it makes absolutely no sense at all. The HW tank does not somehow suddenly 'create' a new level to which we must now reference the head, as you seem to believe, as it is still backed by the additional 0.2bar pressure we already have between CWS and HW tank. Go down another 2 metres vertically to the kitchen and we have 4 metres of head, or 0.4bar if you will.
By your logic, if the HW tank was on the second floor with 2 metres between top of HW tank and bottom of CWS tank, any head measurements would start from the top of the HW tank. So, you're trying to tell me that despite their being an additional 2 metres of head between the two tanks, the outlet at the top of the HW tank will have a head of 0 metres? In which case, there would be absolutely no flow, which you know will not be the case. Physics tells us this, but it's demonstrated in my house where the shower head is ABOVE the top of the HW tank, but BELOW the bottom of the CWS tank.
In essence, if you ignore the heat exchanger, the HW tank is simply a VERY large diameter pipe. It DOES NOT alter the system head at all, just as a section of pipe does not alter the head in anything other than its vertical drop.
Now raise the cylinder even more, the higher you go the lower the head, and the smaller the flow rate becomes, as you said physics.
As far as this thread is concerned the top of the cylinder is virtually level with the bottom of the tank, therefore the head will be very very low.
No no no no no! It's all about the difference in height between the bottom of the CWS tank, and the outlet, be it a tap, shower, or anything else. Let me try one final example to convince you...
My previous house had a HW tank with integrated header tank, the header being integrated onto the top of the cylinder although normal in every other respect, i.e. float valve filler, overflow, etc. Distance between bottom of header tank and top of cylinder was ZERO, where the CWS tank ends, the HW tank starts. By your reckoning, I have zero head, but lo and behold... water came out the taps! What's more, the dynamic pressure on upstairs taps was very poor, but dynamic pressure (and flow rate) on downstairs taps was excellent. Not coincidentally, the HW tank was located upstairs!
If you were correct, there would have been poor HW flow rate everywhere, in fact, as there's no head (by your definition, not mine) there should have been NO flow to ANY of the taps. It just isn't true.
Try and remember what you get out of the cylinder is all you get, 5 Ltrs/min in the loft, cannot be turned into 20 Ltrs/min in the kitchen.
Again, wrong, for all the reasons above. This just IS NOT true, and it goes against the laws of physics. Did you not have a toy in nursery school which was essentially a tube with a bunch of holes drilled at different levels in the side? Water from the bottom hole projected a lot further than from the top, as the pressure was higher down there. The principle is the same.