Concentration camps

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think I might try joe-90's style of debate. Ask questions, ignore the answers and then rant that no one has answered the question. When a direct question is asked, either ignore it or dodge it.

You never answer my questions.

Why did they save all the typhus victims?
 
Sponsored Links
No but I can see the stupidity of your answer.

These weren't people killed in battle. They weren't blown up by bombs. They aren't at the bottom of the ocean.

They were killed in a controlled fashion that left an intact body in the hands of the killers.

!2,000,000 of them. 24 times the population of Liverpool.

What did they do with them after they were murdered?

Why cannot you answer that?

Just tell me what they did with 4 million if you like.

How did they get rid of the bodies? Burn them? Well Uri you may not realise it but human bodies don't like to burn.
Now stop being pathetic and tell me where they are. (he won't)
:rolleyes:

If I was playing Fallacy Bingo, I'd probably have won pages ago reading your posts:
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html

Failure To State
Strawman Argument
Ambiguous Assertion
Changing The Subject (Digression, Red Herring, Misdirection, False Emphasis)
Argument From Personal Astonishment
Non Sequitur

To name a few.

You don't gas people with diesel engines.

What was the fuel used to burn a million people?

Why have you only got a reconstruction fireplace?

What a pathetic site that was. Is that the best you can come up with?
 
Sponsored Links
Yes Pred. What was the fuel used to kill a million people and how did they kill them?
 
Kraut basher springs to mind.

And your name in German freely translated from Joe is Holzkopf
 
Kraut basher springs to mind.

And your name in German freely translated from Joe is Holzkopf

You're not listening again, you asked what fuel they used, my reply was "HOLZ" they've got forest loads of the stuff.
 
Yes but you believe anything that suits you.

6. If Auschwitz wasn't a "death camp," what was its true purpose?

The IHR says (original):

It was a large-scale manufacturing complex. Synthetic rubber (Buna) was made there, and its inmates were used as a workforce. The Buna process was used in the U.S. during WWII.

The IHR says (revised):

It was an internment center and part of a large-scale manufacturing complex. Synthetic fuel was produced there, and its inmates were used as a workforce.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/qar/qar06.html

:rolleyes:



It's a tactical error on their part to admit this, however, because in question number 40, they state that it was impossible to burn corpses because there wasn't any fuel. Yet they admit that there was a fuel-synthesis plant just a few miles away. It did produce fuel, and in fact was an Allied bombing target for that reason. Another internal contradiction.

:LOL: :LOL:
 
But no-one remembers it being used. Funny that eh? You'd need a heck of a lot of it to burn a million bodies. Maybe it was just magic or spontaneous combustion eh?

Do you really think they'd fight a war and waste fuel on dead people? FFS. :rolleyes:
 
German Fuel Shortage Of World War 2




The Fuel Shortage Caused Germany to Lose World War 2.


A German fuel shortage in World War 2, caused largely by Germany's small oil reserves, was a factor in the German defeat.

During World War 2, Germany fought desperately to overcome an acute fuel shortage. They made heavy use of synthetic fuels but were only partly successful in alleviating their shortage, but perhaps the United States, now facing an acute oil and energy crisis, can learn something from the German efforts.

Two major references for this web page were the book Inside The Third Reich by Albert Speer, and the article The Role Of Synthetic Fuel In World War II Germany by Dr. Peter W. Becker. See the following web page for the Becker article: German Fuel Shortage World War 2




So that rules that one out eh Peaps? ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top