Only in the genitive tense.
In Germany a normally-open switch is called a "closer" and normally-closed is called an "opener".
I had heard that the Germans are well known for making training videos for opening and closing genitives.Only in the genitive tense.
I would imagine that nearly all of our minds think essentially like that, in terms of the fairly ‘clear-cut’ ones. However, harping back to what I wrote on page 1, what would you think about something which looked like:I, personally distinguish between the two as follows ... If it looks like this ... I'd call that a contactor ... If it looks like this ... then I'd call them Relays
Again, as already discussed, I think most would agree with that as a working generalisation. However, as you can see here, the one pictured above is rated at 1000A (albeit DC) – and you don’t have to look far to find things called ‘contactors’ rated at 5A, 3A or even lower.If you were to ask me what they are used for I'd say ... Contactors are primarily used to switch heavier loads ... Relays are used in control circuits for logic switching and to switch on small loads
I mentioned auxillary contacts at the start, and have to agree that I haven’t seen relays with such a facility (or ‘interlock’ facilities) - so I'd certainly agree with that bit. I’m not sure what you mean by ‘double disconnection’ – you presumably aren’t denying the existence of 2-pole and 3-pole relays? Are you perhaps talking about the actually mechanics of the disconnecting? (I have a feeling that, in many contactors, neither of the functional contacts actually move – instead, they are both fixed a ‘connecting bar’ joins them in the ‘on’ condition. Mind you, I’ve also seen that in some ‘plug in relays’, including at least one available from Maplin)If you were to ask me how they differ physically/mechanically then ... Contactors usually can be fitted with auxiliary devices and double disconnect their poles. ... Relays usually can not and only disconnect one pole
I’m not sure what you mean by ‘double disconnection
Indeed - what you are describing is exactly what I was referring to when I wrote:Hi John I mean that there are two contacts per pole mate, ... Now below is a contactor, and its associated circuit diagram, you will see that it is pretty much indistinguishable from the relay diagram ... But if you actually opened it up and looked at the contacts you would see that in reality there are actually two fixed contacts per pole
the above diagram attached to that contactor should really look like this
However, as I went on to say ....I have a feeling that, in many contactors, neither of the functional contacts actually move – instead, they are both fixed a ‘connecting bar’ joins them in the ‘on’ condition.
It looks like, smells like and is called a 'relay', but it has the contact arrangement (albeit a '2-way' version thereof) which you describe as identifying it as a contactor (and it also has a contact rating of 30A, which goes a bit against one of your other distinguishing features of relay vs. contactor).Mind you, I’ve also seen that in some ‘plug in relays’, including at least one available from Maplin)
It looks like, smells like and is called a 'relay', but it has the contact arrangement (albeit a '2-way' version thereof) which you describe as identifying it as a contactor (and it also has a contact rating of 30A, which goes a bit against one of your other distinguishing features of relay vs. contactor).Mind you, I’ve also seen that in some ‘plug in relays’, including at least one available from Maplin)
Kind Regards, John
I conceded that it does not fullfil the 'auxillary devices' criterion (which is, in fact, not possible with many a small 'contactor') but I don't really understand what you're saying. It certainly looks like a relay and, as you say, cannot have auxillary devices (hence tending to make it a 'relay'), but it has a fairly high switching capacity and has the sort of double disconenction that you said was usually present in contactors, but never in relays. It therefore seems to me that, by your criteria, that product is about 50:50 relay and contactor!No it doesn't John, it might switch 30A but you can't fit auxiliary devices to itIt looks like, smells like and is called a 'relay', but it has the contact arrangement (albeit a '2-way' version thereof) which you describe as identifying it as a contactor (and it also has a contact rating of 30A, which goes a bit against one of your other distinguishing features of relay vs. contactor).
What do you mean? I have the relay in my hand, and phographed it and drew the diagram (well, by modification of yours ) myself this morning. In what way do you feel you can guarantee that my diagram does not exactly match the relay? There are 4 (fixed) contacts. A large lump of copper or brass attached to the armature joins either one pair of contacts or the other pair. As I see it, the only thing 'wrong' with my diagram is that I have shown the 'moving contact' in a mid-position that would never normally occur - but I did that deliberately, because I thought some people may have misunderstood had I shown it in contact with one of the pairs of (fixed) contacts (i.e the true resting state).That drawing does not exactly match that relay either, I guarantee it
What do you mean? I have the relay in my hand, and phographed it and drew the diagram (well, by modification of yours ) myself this morning. In what way do you feel you can guarantee that my diagram does not exactly match the relay? There are 4 (fixed) contacts. A large lump of copper or brass attached to the armature joins either one pair of contacts or the other pair. As I see it, the only thing 'wrong' with my diagram is that I have shown the 'moving contact' in a mid-positionThat drawing does not exactly match that relay either, I guarantee it
Kind Regards, John
Fair enough - but,as I went on to explain, I did that deliberately for what I (seemingly misguidedly!) thought would be better clarity for some people! If it makes you more comfortable:That's what I was getting at John I thought that the diagram had come with the relay, didn't realise you had drawn it your selfAs I see it, the only thing 'wrong' with my diagram is that I have shown the 'moving contact' in a mid-position...
I conceded that it does not fullfil the 'auxillary devices' criterion (which is, in fact, not possible with many a small 'contactor') but I don't really understand what you're saying. It certainly looks like a relay and, as you say, cannot have auxillary devices (hence tending to make it a 'relay'), but it has a fairly high switching capacity and has the sort of double disconenction that you said was usually present in contactors, but never in relays. It therefore seems to me that, by your criteria, that product is about 50:50 relay and contactor!
Yes, that's all correct - you used the word 'usually' in both cases and did not use the word 'never'.I am glad you noticed my use of the word 'usually' when referring to contactors John
I'm sure that I also applied the same word when referring to relays Don't recall using the word 'never'
I realise that, and I'm not arguing, either. I was merely trying to underline what I and others have been saying all along about the fact that there are 'grey areas', and I think your description of how you personally make the distinction makes that as true of your view as any other. The product I've been discussing seems to tick two of your relay boxes (looks like a relay and can't have auxillary contacts etc.) but also one or two of your contactor boxes ('double disconnection' and fairly high current rating). I've merely been underlining that the disctinction is not always all that clear-cut.Listen as I said earlier in my first post This is how I personally distinguish between the two, I'm not arguing the toss between whether its right or wrong, as I said It seems to work in the field for me
Indeed - in many, but not all, cases, there would probably be general consensus.But if I were to ask you to check say all of the plant control relays then I'd expect you to go straight to them without arguing the toss that technically the BMS ones are the same
[/b]I conceded that it does not fullfil the 'auxillary devices' criterion (which is, in fact, not possible with many a small 'contactor') but I don't really understand what you're saying. It certainly looks like a relay and, as you say, cannot have auxillary devices (hence tending to make it a 'relay'), but it has a fairly high switching capacity and has the sort of double disconenction that you said was usually present in contactors, but never in relays. It therefore seems to me that, by your criteria, that product is about 50:50 relay and contactor!
I am glad you noticed my use of the word 'usually' when referring to contactors John
I'm sure that I also applied the same word when referring to relays
Don't recall using the word 'never'
Listen as I said earlier in my first post This is how I personally distinguish between the two, I'm not arguing the toss between whether its right or wrong, as I said It seems to work in the field for me
View media item 55912
Sorry the image is upside down (on IPad) I will spin it round later
But in that panel there are contractors, plant control relays and bms relays
And I know they're similar animals
But if I were to ask you to check say all of the plant control relays then I'd expect you to go straight to them without arguing the toss that technically the BMS ones are the same
I haven't got the time mate
Matt
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local