When I'm rich

[Gerrydelasel]

 

[^woody^]

He is not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy.

 

[woodbine]

That's the sort of thing, Gerry, and having a Christian image will offend his sensibilities even more.

 

[Ian H]

I particularly like the 2:49 part

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

He is not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy.

While we are stereotyping, don't forget the gheys make great interior designers.

And lesbos good hod carriers - well the ones that have the crew cut, check shirt and dungarees. Not the fit ones

With such homophobic comments as this, I think my comment is highly appropriate.
When I am back at my desk I will add a few more of woody's homophobic and other crude obscenties.

As a so-called professional, he relies on aggressive and obscene comments to defend his professional opinions. That indicates that he is totally devoid of professional integrity. He is a fraud, an imposter, a troll.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Nice picture Gerry. Evidently your artistic abilities far outweigh your political awareness.
And thank you for retaining the original message.

Sadly woody thinks that he is The One true professional. I am aware of at least two professionals that were deeply offended by him just in the last few months. That is two professionals that were potential contributors to the site, but woody managed to offend them sufficiently for them to reconsider their willingness to contribute.
That is two in three months. At that rate, with extrapolation, we can assume that woody alone is responsible for driving away up to eighty other professionals from this site. What an achievement! No doubt he is proud of his homophobic and obscene vulgarity in defending his opinions.

 

[^woody^]

Soft lads were they?

 

[Gerrydelasel]

With such homophobic comments as this...

But Woody said "While we are stereotyping,", so doesn't that prove he was being ironic and not, in fact, homophobic? i.e. he doesn't actually believe those things, he knows they're stereotypes and was in that way pointing out how they're not true just like all the other stereotypes that have been posted earlier?

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

But Woody said "While we are stereotyping,", so doesn't that prove he was being ironic and not, in fact, homophobic? i.e. he doesn't actually believe those things,

Kind of you to do woody's explanations for him. I do not accept it one bit though. I did say:

When I am back at my desk I will add a few more of woody's homophobic and other obscenities.

I am working from only an iPad at the moment. I do not choose to use borrowed equipment for such activities and I am not in control of network speeds, etc.
It will be a couple of weeks yet, so you will have to be patient.

 

[blightymam]

. I am aware of at least two professionals that were deeply offended by him just in the last few months. That is two professionals that were potential contributors to the site, but woody managed to offend them sufficiently for them to reconsider their willingness to contribute.

Coming back as different aliases Himmy and getting offended doesn't count as two different people.

And while we're on the subject of people not good for this place, how many times have you been banned now Himmy and how many times as Woody?

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Soft lads were they?

Do you mean, "did they display more professional integrity than you?"
For the short time they were contributing, Yes. Absolutely!
You appear to be pleased with your little achievement of discouraging other professionals to participate in this site.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Coming back as different aliases Himmy and getting offended doesn't count as two different people.

And while we're on the subject of people not good for this place, how many times have you been banned now Himmy and how many times as Woody?

You have completely lost your tiny mind!
I cancelled my previous registration due to woody's aggressive, fatuous, unsupported, unprovable (nor any attempt to support) his allegation.
I only returned to ridicule him.
As you are mimicking his habit of fatuous, unsupported, unprovable allegations I will continue to ridicule you. it is not difficult.

 

[^woody^]

I do not choose to use borrowed equipment

Unlike the text you choose to borrow.

Is cut n' paste easier on the old iPad? It must be going by the repetition in the posts.

 

[blightymam]

You have completely lost your tiny mind!
I cancelled my previous registration due to woody's aggressive, fatuous, unsupported, unprovable (nor any attempt to support) his allegation.
I only returned to ridicule him.
As you are mimicking his habit of fatuous, unsupported, unprovable allegations I will continue to ridicule you. it is not difficult.

Nope, not lost my mind, clearly you have by believing your own lies.
There is only one person who writes the way you do on DIYnot, and that's you Himmy. Not only do you write in the unusual style you do, you get offended by the smallest of things. It's very hard to change the way a person is, you demonstrate that clearly every time you rejoin after being banned.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Unlike the text you choose to borrow.

Is cut n' paste easier on the old iPad? It must be going by the repetition in the posts.

Still absolutely no attempt at supporting or proving your original allegation?
Nor the decency, honesty or integrity of admitting your mistake?