- Joined
- 23 Nov 2018
- Messages
- 442
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
You don't, you can only process them within the legal definitions and processes.How do you know they have flown from persecution?
You don't, you can only process them within the legal definitions and processes.How do you know they have flown from persecution?
According to gossip.Oh yes it is.
.
Oh yes it is.
Don't you have an answer as to why its those from Iran - which is not subject to the war-torn narrative that we are fed about the other "migrants" from the "war-torn" countries.
So just to make things perfectly clear...My answer would be to escort them to edge of our waters and say off you go, apply properly next time.
No, you have tried to 'estsblish' -but been proven wrongWe've already established that there is no legal or moral requirement for a refugee to register in the first country that they arrive
refugee boats
You seem to believe that just because someone claims asylum in any one country that there is some legal obligation in that country to grant asylum.We've already established that there is no legal or moral requirement for a refugee to register in the first country that they arrive.
There may be very valid reasons for a refugee to prefer to register in UK. Family, language, career, qualifications to name just a few.
Iranian students used to and still do come to UK to study. One such university's Iranian student population: "... students from Iran ... In 2016/17 we have 23 Iranian students ... " https://www.southampton.ac.uk/uni-life/international/your-country/middle-east/iran.page
Another uni reports: "30 students from Iran studying at Queen Mary" https://www.qmul.ac.uk/international-students/countries/iran/
Another Uni reports: "53 students from Iran" https://www.manchester.ac.uk/study/international/country-specific-information/iran/
We've also already established that there are no legal or moral basis for forcibly moving refugees, rescued from the sea by UK border force, to any other destination other than the UK.
As Motman states it is a relatively small number, a very relatively small number. compared to 120,000 in 2017 to Italy alone.
As there are already so many refugees in other southern Europe countries, it is hardly surprising if some prefer to travel further.
Just as I suspected...Prove it.
Clearly they can't otherwise they'd have applied for asylum in France.
There is no legal requirement for a refugee to register in the first country of arrival.No, you have tried to 'estsblish' -but been proven wrong
it would not be possible to return refugees:
One aspect of the system is referred to as the Dublin system or the Dublin Regulation. This piece of EU law provides broadly that where an asylum seeker has been fingerprinted in an EU Member State but then moves on to another EU Member State, the asylum seeker can be sent back to the first country to have the asylum claim processed there.
For example, if an asylum seeker reaches Italy, is fingerprinted then travels to the UK and claims asylum, pretty much the first thing the Home Office will do is take fingerprints, check them against the central Eurodac fingerprint database and then if a match is found notify the other country and send the asylum seeker back there pronto.
There are currently several hundred such “Dublin removals” every year from the United Kingdom. It is system that the UK is very happy with, but Italy and Greece rather less so
The principle of first safe country needs to be applied more rigorously,
Just as I suspected...
A gutless armchair warrior who mouths off and then always dodges a direct question!
Prove it.
Clearly they can't otherwise they'd have applied for asylum in France.
Totally irrelevant, just like Javid's comment.