Yeah. A lot of people don’t like football.I get you.
In the one instance, it was a footballer's funeral. In the other, it wasn't.
That explains it.
Sorry but that's a common factor in both cases, a lot of people don't like Muslims.Yeah. A lot of people don’t like football.
Are you falsely assuming that people who hate football automatically hate all football fans?Sorry but that's a common factor in both cases, a lot of people don't like Muslims.
There's Islamophobia, but I've never heard of footballophobia.
Does it?Islamophobia definitely means a lot of people are actively hating of Muslims.
No, but it's eminently possible that people who dislike football do so because of the football fans.Are you falsely assuming that people who hate football automatically hate all football fans?
I said:Islamophobia definitely means a lot of people are actively hating of Muslims.
Do you want my opinion, or a dictionary definition?Does it?
Yes, of course, but it wouldn't be Islamophobia.Can one not hate a religion - or all religions - without hating the people?
Do you mean that the words are used intentionally to disguise their meaning?These words are bandied about willy-nilly so that people don't really know what they are supposed to mean.
Bizzare conclusion...I dislike footy and F1 because they bore the tìts off me..Nothing to do with who likes them.No, but it's eminently possible that people who dislike football do so because of the football fans.
But you must accept that it is the behaviour of some of the fans that turn some people away from some sports, events, etc.?Bizzare conclusion...I dislike footy and F1 because they bore the tìts off me..Nothing to do with who likes them.
So it is not actually the football that they dislike.No, but it's eminently possible that people who dislike football do so because of the football fans.
I will for this discussion accept the (semantically incorrect) general usage of 'phobia'.Do you want my opinion, or a dictionary definition?
Ok, but that religionophobia must include islamophobia.Yes, of course, but it wouldn't be Islamophobia.
It might be religionophobia.
Not to disguise, as such, but I would think the words are (mis)used intentionally to confuse people because when words are misused it is unclear what is actually meant.Do you mean that the words are used intentionally to disguise their meaning?
""""""In 2005, police in Palm Beach, Florida, began investigating Epstein after a parent complained that he had sexually abused her 14-year-old daughter.[7] Epstein pleaded guilty and was convicted in 2008 by a Florida state court of procuring an underage girl for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute.[8] He served almost 13 months in custody, but with extensive work release"""":Splitting hairs again Tefal.Whether 13 or 14..still underage.Take the example of Jeffrey Epstein; it is commonplace by reporters for his name to be preceded by "the paedophile" even though he was not accused nor charged with that crime.
No it means under 13.....not 14.....but I have no problem with The labelling of Epstein.Paedo should be under 16.That confirms what I wrote. Thank you.
Paedophilia does not mean under age.
Off again spitting hairs as is your obsession...You can probably never grasp Gay means anything other than jolly.Language evolves.Paedophilia does not mean under age.
No it doesn't. It means an attraction to pre-pubescent children.No it means under 13.....not 14.....but I have no problem with The labelling of Epstein.Paedo should be under 16.
No, I accept that. Not splitting hairs; two totally separate hairs.Off again spitting hairs as is your obsession...You can probably never grasp Gay means anything other than jolly.
Only because of misuse due to ignorance becoming so common place.Language evolves.