- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,983
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country

They won't make money if people are dead.How so? The largest outlay is care.

They won't make money if people are dead.How so? The largest outlay is care.
It's a revolving door.They won't make money if people are dead.
Given the large amount of money required to keep a person alive against their will, just put the cost of a one time mercy drug into the equation and I suspect the NHS would be 'quids in'!How much will it cost the person who is asking the State for permission to kill them or is it free on the NHS?
You see everything through the lens of a conspiracy theoryIn Canada, they have widened the bandwidth of MAID to include mentally ill/distressed people. It's not how the bill began. I don't believe this bill is about helping people, not really, I think it is about making money for Big Pharma and knocking off as many people as possible who are seen as a burden on resources.
How is the lethal drug(s) administered?Given the large amount of money required to keep a person alive against their will, just put the cost of a one time mercy drug into the equation and I suspect the NHS would be 'quids in'!
I've been listening to all sides of the debate and have serious reservations.You see everything through the lens of a conspiracy theory
It’s totally clouding your ability to take an informed standpoint on anything.
You want to edit my posts down to 4 words, conversation over.The voice of ignorance.
In Canada, they have widened the bandwidth of MAID to include mentally ill/distressed people. It's not how the bill began. I don't believe this bill is about helping people, not really, I think it is about making money for Big Pharma and knocking off as many people as possible who are seen as a burden on resources.
Canada has its own way of looking at this complicated issue, as do other countries, so its best to stick with the UK bill in that case which makes no provision, as far as i know, for end of life care for the mentally ill.
In other news, the growing demand to remove judgement by the High Court is a step forward to simplifying the process, which anti-campaigners are getting in a twist about.
This is the U.K. not CanadaWhat I am trying to say is that they extended the bill's catchment after it had been approved into law. Unless 'terminally ill adult' is specifically defined it could cover those with diagnosis of mental illness. That is eugenics.

I believe in Canada it is administered orally.How is the lethal drug(s) administered?