Ssssssshhhhhh, don't mention Reform.

Nonsense.
Why are the only 2 European countries not in the ECHR, places with terrible human rights abuses and no democracy.



Farage is a right wing populist like Trump

Have a look at Trumps attacks on democracy and human rights - detaining people without due process.

British citizens should be very alarmed by any leader wanting to remove International oversight of human rights.
 
I would be if it was true but an opinion paper that actually has quite a few errors in it, hasn’t changed anything. Fortunately, their recommendations and conclusions are not law and the human rights act is very clear about how we should determine and address incompatibility.

If a small boat is deemed in distress based on its condition (as per the paper), they should be rescued when the set off.
Pushbacks against migrant boats are not legal.

This is a settled matter.

I am not interested in relitigating an old argument that you have lost.

Please refrain from posting more lies on this matter, it is closed
 
Nigel Farage is now looking to attack abortion laws.

Farage spends has lots of close links to Christian fundamentalists.

Taking freedoms is a goto of right wing populism

People need to be really really careful what they wish for


 
Nigel Farage is now looking to attack abortion laws.

Farage spends has lots of close links to Christian fundamentalists.

Taking freedoms is a goto of right wing populism

People need to be really really careful what they wish for


This will not affect my vote, I am not looking towards getting an abortion.
 
The “safe country” thing is bolox. You know that.
IMG_7723.jpeg

So why don’t they stop in Italy or France instead of risking their lives crossing the busiest shipping lane in the world in a rubber boat?
 
View attachment 383054

So why don’t they stop in Italy or France instead of risking their lives crossing the busiest shipping lane in the world in a rubber boat?
If asylum.seekers had to stop in the first safe country they would all stay in neighbouring countries like Turkey.

That would overload those regions and destabilise them.

Anyway just because of a fluke of geography why should Italy or France take them and not UK.


Your claim is one you've repeated many times, I have explained it many times.....are you incapable of learning, it appears so
 
If asylum.seekers had to stop in the first safe country they would all stay in neighbouring countries like Turkey.

That would overload those regions and destabilise them.
Ah, so they are just being considerate to the first and second safe countries they land in. What wonderful people. Do you think they are given the numbers when they pass through to enable them to make that very considerate decision? Do the Italian authorities say "Full up, keep going" and then France say "Full up, keep going" and then Copthorne says "Fùck off, we're 93% white English here and that’s how we want it to stay". Is that how it works?
 
It's easier here, nicer accommodation, benefits etc I don't blame them.
So you think people who are so motivated to find there way across Europe taking great risks do it is because they are so lazy they just want to do nothing and live off benefits.

It's such a lazy argument, pushed by people who don't think.
 
Aveatry quote: “1) you don’t believe in man made climate change: Correct - its bulshit”

Aveatry is so clever he claimed that the atmosphere would benefit from CO2 levels of a 1000ppm:ROFLMAO:
If you really want me to pull your pants down in the middle of the playground again on that one then I suggest you start a new thread.
 
Back
Top