- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,816
- Reaction score
- 5,356
- Country
National Grooming Gangs Inquiry Announced
- Thread starter MNW67
- Start date
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
So you don't agree that all sex crime scum should be punished equally? I am surprised ..Agree with you you having a
Start with a fair definition of what constitutes a gang.
Can you honestly accept that just two people knowing each other constitutes a 'gang'? That report would make Fred and Rose West as well as Ian Brady and Myra Hindley a 'gang' and give them the same status as a gang of 10 Asians. So that’s 4 white individual monsters v 10 individual Asian ones but going on pure statistics and using the definition of a gang as per the report criteria, it would mean there’s twice as many white gangs as Asians! Bloody ridiculous.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
Why does it matter though?
Jail them all and cut off their goolies, things like how many make a gang is just a complete and utter distraction.
With that I can agree.
I'm confused by the debate on this within the forum. The Report has stated that, disproportionately, based on the available data, Pakistani men are the main perpetrators of these grooming gangs. Or have I misunderstood?
Going OT but in a way linked, it's like when discussing people on benefits. Try to say 'a percentage of them will be quite happy staying on benefits and not working' and the wokies shout you down, stating 'no one on benefits wants to be on benefits.'
When it comes to certain subjects, why the feck can't we just accept what we all know to be FACT?
Going OT but in a way linked, it's like when discussing people on benefits. Try to say 'a percentage of them will be quite happy staying on benefits and not working' and the wokies shout you down, stating 'no one on benefits wants to be on benefits.'
When it comes to certain subjects, why the feck can't we just accept what we all know to be FACT?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
The available data is from three forces in the Rochdale area, no one else. You are focusing too much on race.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,816
- Reaction score
- 5,356
- Country
"Bob finds a picture of his kids playing naked on the beach when they were young. It's an innocent enough keep sake. It was from a time when nobody cared about toddlers playing naked in the sand. Bob scans it to keep and shows it to his now grown up kid, he views it on his iPad.. Bob is guilty of making and distributing offensive photographs of children and operating a CSE/CSA gang, Bob's son is guilty of making, even though the picture is of him."
Seems silly doesn't it but the indecent image laws are very broad. "Making" is opening to view. "distributing" is making available for access. The fact that Bob and his son are white British and the Police would likely NFA it, is irrelevant. They go on the data. Meanwhile someone is raping and grooming actual children.
Seems silly doesn't it but the indecent image laws are very broad. "Making" is opening to view. "distributing" is making available for access. The fact that Bob and his son are white British and the Police would likely NFA it, is irrelevant. They go on the data. Meanwhile someone is raping and grooming actual children.
According to data that I have seen, Rotherham for example is not a Pakistani community. Oys more white tha n Notch's nimby village.
Nonsense. I understand it perfectly.
It's not difficult to grasp that between 80 and 90% of all CSA/CSE crimes are committed by white British men, no.
Nor is it difficult to understand that a majority (80%+) group related offences are committed by white males.
Such as these rapists...
Or these rapists...
