It's exactly what was proposed. Cut the tax free cash ISA allowance, but not the S&S allowance.
No, you're conflating your interpretation with the effect.
Quoting a particular period on the SM , only makes sense if the period is long enough. It certainly makes no sense to quote a particulat company's shares, expect in a few very long known cases.
"Since April" fools nobody - the SM dived into April this year, if you had funds you wouldn't have had if you'd wanted steady growth.
In fact one would have to ask "which April did you mean".
That sort of response DOES NOT HELP. Stop it!
The world seems to be full of people getting things wrong - usually on purpose - so they can try to win an argument. Even on the Money Programme the expert asserted that the stock market bounces up and down all the time. That's just low quality rubbish.
There has ALWAYS been a part of the SM referred to as FIXED INTEREST.
Institutions can make up any fund they want to, they do it all the time, so making one which performed EXACTLY like a BS wouldn't be hard.
Some existing ones pay out a stated rate in dividends, you can just put it back into the fund so it grows at the stated rate.
It would take almost no tweaking of that fund to make it look just like a BS account.
Guaranteeing "Bank rate plus 1%" would satisfy most people.
BS fund rates are pegged very closely to the "Bank Rate", That's available on the SM.
They tend to have funny names, but here's one "everyone" interested knows about. Referred to as "Cash 2".
They're all based on the Money Market.
Sure you can have these in your S & S ISA.
---
If you go to
Hargreaves Lansdown, you can (once you found the right bit) add SECTORs as well as individual funds to a chart.
So here are three over the last 12 months, which is a fair period because it contained an unusually large disruption. which we haven't seen in the last few years. (Nowt special about HL except their charting tool).
The orange line is the one I keep on about.
The brown one is the money market, pretty much the same as Building Societies. (Remember though that you aren't committed to a period, you can sell whenever you like)
The grey is the average of that sector, which is a good choice if you can stand a bit of wobble. It's all Bonds, not company shares.
It will contain some higher rate short term bonds etc.
The orange one does well because they're clever. When the underlying sources dip, they go "short" , as many funds do, and they use other techniques I won't bore you with, and I may not have quite right.
Using equities (company shares) it's easy to beat these, but clearly some don't want to "go there" - fine. No need.
Stop pretending you have to! You can quite easily use better sectors, shortish term, like for a few months, but that does take some effort!. EG FInancials is doing particularly well in the last 3 months. Or semiconductors, or AI, etc etc.
IF Rache steers us down this route, I'm sure the likes of HL will announce new and renamed funds, to the benefit of many.