Did you have ownership of them?
-
Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.
Angela rayner tax dodger again...
- Thread starter motorbiking
- Start date
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,768
- Reaction score
- 5,336
- Country
You forgot to put WRONG in capitals.
So according to you her expert tax advisor got it wrong and she didn’t need to pay 2nd property tax?
I think if you toddle off and read up on the subject you will see that I’m right. Again.
“Interest” in both. Just like Angela. Eventually, my my first home was transferred to my ex, however, unlike Angela I retained no interest in the property.
A lifetime right to live in a house = is an interest.
Not according to the government:
Note: the bit about having an “interest” in a property applies if you are the beneficiary of a trust
What property the higher rates apply to
When you know who the rules apply to, you should work out how many residential properties each of you will own at the end of the day of your new purchase.If any of you will own, or part own more than one residential property worth £40,000 or more, you will have to pay the higher rates on your new purchase (unless there is another reason why the higher rates do not apply).
Include any residential property that:
- is owned on behalf of children under the age of 18 (parents are treated as the owners even if the property is held through a trust and they are not the trustees)
- you have an interest in as the beneficiary of a trust
Higher rates of Stamp Duty Land Tax
Check if you have to pay the higher rates of Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) when you buy a residential property in England or Northern Ireland.
Does she have a lifetime right to live in the house?
Perhaps you have read the trust in full, I’m sure you have…..
Funny how you never mentioned that before….I guess you thought of it.
If you can provide the HMRC text that states that and it applies to the trust in question, I will give it my consideration.
- Joined
- 22 Aug 2006
- Messages
- 7,050
- Reaction score
- 1,171
- Country
If she's not a lying scumbag, we should see her sue the advisor she paid, right? Quite a sum, in view of the embarrassment.
Housing minister ffs.
How likely is it that the lawyer she consuted actually got it wrong?
Guilty until proven innocent.
Housing minister ffs.
How likely is it that the lawyer she consuted actually got it wrong?
Guilty until proven innocent.
It’s about professional negligence, if what Ange says is true.
- Joined
- 31 Aug 2005
- Messages
- 4,420
- Reaction score
- 589
- Country
Irrespective of the party the very top position in the country you don't make basic rookie errors like this, and to claim its not your specialist area makes the point i have raised here many times.
When in any company do you promote your mate.. er work colleague to a top position without knowing first they area a specialist in this area already. This is negligence by the person who selected her for this position and her also.
I think we are all absolutely sick to the back teeth of being lied to and treated like idiots by this and the previous government, replace her with an SME in housing not another fekin mate!
Id like to give a mention to the likes of Wes Streeting(just to show i am not like the childish football mentality remedials on here supporting as long as theyre red, blue etc), be like him, keep yourself squeaky clean, deliver in proffessional manner at all times, be like Wes and you wouldn't be in this pickle now Angela you foul mouthed arrogant person.
When in any company do you promote your mate.. er work colleague to a top position without knowing first they area a specialist in this area already. This is negligence by the person who selected her for this position and her also.
I think we are all absolutely sick to the back teeth of being lied to and treated like idiots by this and the previous government, replace her with an SME in housing not another fekin mate!
Id like to give a mention to the likes of Wes Streeting(just to show i am not like the childish football mentality remedials on here supporting as long as theyre red, blue etc), be like him, keep yourself squeaky clean, deliver in proffessional manner at all times, be like Wes and you wouldn't be in this pickle now Angela you foul mouthed arrogant person.
Conveyancers ask for stamp duty up front, they do the calcs Ange believed she didn’t own another property.
Has it struck you that you know more about property law than Ange (and most of the rest of the country)?
Load of bowlogs: specialism is what the Civil Service is for.
The government minister is there to tell them what the government requires to happen, and their job is to either make it happen, explain to the minister why it would be unwise for it to happen, or explain to minister why it cannot happen.
There is actually a danger in having specialists as ministers. They think they know it all already and don't listen to the advice they get from those who are almost certainly more knowledgeable.
That's a good point.
The Sky News article says that her son is the sole beneficiary.
I would want to see the actual regulation to be sure what it means. But I can't seem to find it.
Could this be it?
Last edited:
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,768
- Reaction score
- 5,336
- Country
Last edited:
Which post was that a reply to?
