OMG Human Rights Lawyers Again

[Highway Man]

So the 1 in 1 out deal was once again another farce and disaster to remove the illegals from the UK. The plane took off with 0 illegals on board, great. Human rights lawyers yet again determined to stop anything that removes these from our country. Just ignore the simpletons. Wouldn't you think Kier Starmer would have known this?

 

[noseall]

Wouldn't you think Kier Starmer would have known this?

Yep. And the rest of the UK (RWR not included).

 

[Mottie]

Apparently there’s planes taking off with 0 returnees on board every day this week…..

 

[Notch7]

Apparently there’s planes taking off with 0 returnees on board every day this week…..

£800m spent on Rwanda scheme

Number of people deported = 0


By the Tory party that Mottie voted for
And now Mottie supports the Tory Reform party

Vote Reform, get sh1t Tories

 

[motorbiking]

So are the illegals all rushing to Ireland due to the one in one out?

 

[pete01]

They might aswell fill the plane up take off do a loop and land with exactly the same people on board....

One in one out....pppfffttt

 

[MNW67]

I can't see these claims being successful. What would the grounds be. I imagine we will have a few quick test cases and then it will be plain sailing. It was clear with a bonkers scheme like Rwanda that there were good grounds to challenge it. But does anyone really think that sending people to France breaches their human rights?

 

[motorbiking]

According to his lawyer. He faces destitution in France, was trafficked against his will and likely to be persecuted if returned. She thinks she has public opinion on her side.

It seems the home office lawyers screwed up by suggesting he could make further representations, which he could not do from France.

 

[MNW67]

The Court of Appeal decided in 2002 that destitution did not breach the ECHR. The other two grounds don't seem to make any sense.

 

[motorbiking]

The Court of Appeal decided in 2002 that destitution did not breach the ECHR. The other two grounds don't seem to make any sense.

He’s claiming to be a slave.

 

[MNW67]

He’s claiming to be a slave.

In France?

 

[motorbiking]

Mr Justice Sheldon, who rejected the man's claim that he would be left homeless and destitute in France, said that he would nevertheless have to temporarily block the man's departure in light of that development.
"There is a serious issue to be tried in relation to the trafficking claim and whether or not the Secretary of State has carried out her investigatory duties in a lawful manner," he said.
"If there was a reasonable suspicion that he was trafficked - and that does not mean trafficked in or from France - that would amount to a statutory bar to removal for at least a short period of time."

A loophole is born.

 

[MNW67]

What is the anti-trafficking law applying here. It is not something I have really looked at before. Why does it mean somebody can't be moved to France.

 

[motorbiking]

The Nationality and Borders Act 2022

Temporary permission to stay: considerations for victims of human trafficking or slavery (accessible)

www.gov.uk

 

[MNW67]

I've not found anything really helpful yet which explains the decision.

There is mention of a "National Referral Mechanism" for human trafficking. On the face of It, nothing to do with ECHR. But a law brought in 2015 by the Tories.

I think the argument might be that under the 2015 law, the government has to provide medical help and housing for victims of human trafficking.