More serious then a tweet....maybe
It probably depends on what the tweet said! If it was a call for mass murder during a time of national riots...

More serious then a tweet....maybe

I disagree, abusing a child in anyway, I don't think anything is worse.It probably depends on what the tweet said! If it was a call for mass murder during a time of national riots...
I disagree, abusing a child in anyway, I don't think anything is worse.

Make a good judge wouldn't II admire your absolutism!

I guess you didn't read the judges notes, but have just absorbed the headlines ?You're right she deserves a toughr sentence than the immigrant abuser![]()

Still haven't read it, don't need to it cant be worse than child abuse.I guess you didn't read the judges notes, but have just absorbed the headlines ?
Just a section of them, I've highlighted parts of it.
8. By the time you were arrested on the 6th August of this year you haddeleted the account. From enquiries made by that police they were able toestablish that the individual tweet the subject of this offence reminedavailable for at least three and a half hours.
9. The police were however able to trace other tweets that you had sent bothbefore and after the 29th July which included further racist remarks. Onthe 5th August, the day before you were arrested you sent a WhatsAppmessage which included “..raging tweet about burning down hotels hasbit me on the arse lol “ which is commonly understood to mean laugh outloud.
10. You also messaged that if enquiries of you were made, you would denyyou were responsible for the message and if you were arrested you would“ play the mental health card “.
11. I have to apply the Sentencing Council Guidelines for this offence.
12. In relation to your culpability this is clearly a category A case – as bothprosecution and your counsel agree, because you intended to inciteserious violence.

Stick with your headlines then.Still haven't read it, don't need to it cant be worse than child abuse.

If she hadn't have said such stuff, she wouldn't have gone to prison.PressReader.com - Digital Newspaper & Magazine Subscriptions
Digital newsstand featuring 7000+ of the world’s most popular newspapers & magazines. Enjoy unlimited reading on up to 5 devices with 7-day free trial.www.pressreader.com
If she hadn't have said such stuff, she wouldn't have gone to prison.
What's your point?

Why was she in prison ?That Government intervention ensured it was classed as a type A offence rather than a type B offence, and not content with that, there are clearly sinister aspects as to how she was abused in prison and denied certain entitlements.
Why was she in prison ?

Read the judges notes in full, I put up a relevant section earlier.Why was she not granted bail prior to prison, why was her case classed as type A rather than Type B, why wasn't the prison sentence suspended, was she really that much of a threat to the public.
There's lots of why's.
Read the judges notes in full, I put up a relevant section earlier.
Clearly a category A class !