National Grooming Gangs Inquiry Announced

Because of democracy. You know - that process for choosing governments etc which you don't like when not enough voters agree with you.
And don't forget postal votes.
70/80 people entitled to vote, all living in a studio flat...
Let's abolish postal vote for the able and see what happens.
Yes, but those who are shouting the loudest about having investigations and enquiries don't want those widened to look at all ethnicities and all religions, they want them to focus only on the ethnicities and religions they already hate.

I really think that if you offered them a choice between an enquiry which would find ways to protect 50 girls a year from "Asian grooming gang" abuse, and one which would protect 100 children a year from Catholic priest abuse they'd want the former.
You disgust me and would probably disgust a dog if they could read.
Why, when abuse from "white ethnicities" and non "Muslim" groups is mentioned do so many people try to conflate that with trying to "excuse" the crimes of the subset of the population to which they are opposed?
Because rape from white criminals is limited to a disgusting piece of a bastard raping a child.
Asians have been found to gang up together in large groups, conspire to groom kids and then repeatedly rape them for years.
You don't see the difference but we do.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And don't forget postal votes.
70/80 people entitled to vote, all living in a studio flat...
Let's abolish postal vote for the able and see what happens.

Oh look, a Reform supporter.



You're a Hamas supporter, so you have no other option.

A vile accusation for which you have not a shred of evidence, just your desire to lie about anything and anybody you dislike.


Because rape from white criminals is limited to a disgusting piece of a bastard raping a child.

Well that makes it OK then, does it?


Asians have been found to gang up together in large groups, conspire to groom kids and then repeatedly rape them for years.


Sexual abuse in [the context of children's homes and residential care] was perpetrated by a range of individuals either inside or outside the establishments, sometimes by multiple perpetrators described as operating in collusion.
.
.
Participants described how the sexual abuse escalated over time. Grooming often formed part of the sexual abuse perpetrated by ‘outside adults’, although many participants did not recognise it as such at the time. Many participants experienced repeated sexual abuse over a prolonged period of time.


You don't see the difference but we do.

Oh trust me - I see the racist bias difference which you clearly display.
 
Enquiry will only take 3 years :LOL:

Starmer did not want an enquiry ;)

Now there is an argument as to who will chair the cover up oops I mean enquiry :giggle:

Former social worker ?

Person with a Plod back ground ? X police officer

Or some judge ?
 
Enquiry will only take 3 years :LOL:

Starmer did not want an enquiry ;)

Maybe those two are related. There had been so many enquiries, and reports, etc, the most recent being Alexis Jay's 7-year long one.

Did he simply just not want YABE instead of getting on with implementing the recommendations of all the earlier ones?

But he asked Louise Casey (who also started out thinking "what, another one?") to audit the earlier ones , she came back and said actually yes, we do need another one.

And Starmer said "OK, we'll have another one, and it will be a Statutory one" before her report was even published.

Lord knows I'm no fan of that weak, cowardly fence-sitter, but let's try to stick to the truth.
 
Jess Philips stood in the house of commons and called the 3 victim witnesses who quit - liers. Yet again organisations not believing the girls-now women
 
Jess Philips stood in the house of commons and called the 3 victim witnesses who quit - liers.

No, she did not. She said that allegations that a national inquiry into grooming gangs is being diluted or there is intentional delay is “false”. She did not call the witnesses who quit "liars".


Yet again organisations not believing the girls-now women

And she's said nothing about disbelieving them wrt the abuse they suffered.

Is your only interest in this enquiry whether it gives you the opportunity to manufacture false claims in support of your political bias?
 
No, she did not. She said that allegations that a national inquiry into grooming gangs is being diluted or there is intentional delay is “false”. She did not call the witnesses who quit "liars".




And she's said nothing about disbelieving them wrt the abuse they suffered.

Is your only interest in this enquiry whether it gives you the opportunity to manufacture false claims in support of your political bias?
See for yourself
 
Oh look, a Reform supporter.
Again, Get rid of postal vote for the able and see what happens.
A vile accusation for which you have not a shred of evidence, just your desire to lie about anything and anybody you dislike.
Prove it.
Well that makes it OK then, does it?
When I say: "disgusting piece of a bastard", does it sound like I'm approving of it? Or think it's ok?
Oh trust me - I see the racist bias difference which you clearly display.
Racist card played once again.
Every time you do so you become less and less credible and not worth of engagement in conversation.
Stating facts is not racist.
 
Again, Get rid of postal vote for the able and see what happens.
This thread is about sexual abuse, not vote rigging. :rolleyes:

Prove it.
You can't prove a negative. It's your obligation to prove the positive by producing the evidence to support your allegation. :rolleyes:

When I say: "disgusting piece of a bastard", does it sound like I'm approving of it? Or think it's ok?
It sounds like you resort to abusive behaviour at each and every opportunity.

Racist card played once again.
Patterns of your behaviour explained due to your inherent racism, is not 'playing the race card'. It's an explanation of your behaviour.

Every time you do so you become less and less credible and not worth of engagement in conversation.
Irony overload.:rolleyes:

Stating facts is not racist.
Twisting them and misinterpreting them could be, and in your case invariably is.
 
Nothing to do with you, unless you're Mortquana, but...
This thread is about sexual abuse, not vote rigging. :rolleyes:
Convenient for you to say that when truth doesn't fit your agenda.
You're a professional thread swerver but pick on others when truth hurts.
You can't prove a negative. It's your obligation to prove the positive by producing the evidence to support your allegation. :rolleyes:
I've taken a line from your book of nonsense.
It sounds like you resort to abusive behaviour at each and every opportunity.
And I always will against vile criminal disgusting rapists.
Unlike you, approving, supporting and encouraging them.
Patterns of your behaviour explained due to your inherent racism, is not 'playing the race card'. It's an explanation of your behaviour.
Every time you accuse me of being racist because I am against criminals, your level of stupidity goes further up.
I had no idea that a human being could be as stupid as you, but you enlighten me: there's no limit to human stupidity...or better, just your stupidity.
 
Nothing to do with you, unless you're Mortquana, but...

Convenient for you to say that when truth doesn't fit your agenda.
You're a professional thread swerver but pick on others when truth hurts.

I've taken a line from your book of nonsense.

And I always will against vile criminal disgusting rapists.
Unlike you, approving, supporting and encouraging them.

Every time you accuse me of being racist because I am against criminals, your level of stupidity goes further up.
I had no idea that a human being could be as stupid as you, but you enlighten me: there's no limit to human stupidity...or better, just your stupidity.

The fruit cake himmy has always been a grooming gang appeaser

Yes exactly ;)
 
Back
Top