Of course he abused pupils
- Thread starter Odds
- Start date
Another day/night in Wevvies. Another post full of blarney.
You may be thinking of that Reform bloke.
Reform UK's ex-Wales leader Nathan Gill admits pro-Russia bribery
Nathan Gill admits eight charges of bribery while being a Member of the European Parliament.www.bbc.co.uk
Nah he was not a government minister
Accusations made of Farage being a Jew-hater demonstrate one thing: the Lefties are becoming rather worried.
Their time is short now, and thanks to TwoTier's activities, the Labour party is highly unlikely to ever get into government again.
My guess is that they'll quietly change their name in a few years and hope to rise again without anyone noticing who they are.
Their time is short now, and thanks to TwoTier's activities, the Labour party is highly unlikely to ever get into government again.
My guess is that they'll quietly change their name in a few years and hope to rise again without anyone noticing who they are.
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 18,542
- Reaction score
- 1,578
- Country
The term "Jew hater" is a very effective tool to use against certain groups who say things you don't like.
It won't affect Nigel Farages support, his supporters don't care, Netanyahu won't care either because he knows Nigel doesn't like Muslims and will support Israel out of self interest.
There is a well organised and financed campaign in the UK to weaponise antisemitism to undermine support for Palestinians by conflating that support with 'Jew Hate'.
The latest example of that campaign is the case brought against Reginald D Hunter by the Campaign Against Antisemitism.
Fortunately the case was thrown out of court, which could indicate a growing public awareness of the danger to the legal system from foreign entities using lawfare to advance their political agenda's.
Reginald D Hunter court summons quashed for attempt to have him ‘cancelled’
Judge says Campaign Against Antisemitism misled him when bringing ‘abusive’ private prosecution of comedianwww.theguardian.com
I've tracked down more on this story. It looks like the judge was right to throw the case out for abuse of process.
But were the couple at the show right to be offended? Were the jokes actually funny? I should start by saying that I've never really got Reginald Hunter. Apparently, there were two jokes. The second one was about his partner trying to read a review of his show in the Jewish Chronicle. But it was behind a paywall. It is reported in several places that he joked ‘Typical f***ing Jews, they won’t tell you anything unless you subscribe.’ Presumably, it was irony.
Never found Reginald D Hunter particularly funny, i think he played up the "is it cos i is Black" stereotype too much.
However his case raises interesting issues about the abuse of the criminal justice system by groups like the CAA.
Reginald Hunters case isn't an isolated one, I believe the CAA have toytown Nazi Nick Griffin up on a charge, apparently he posted an image of a spider with the Star of David on its head.
What the public should be concerned about is the growth of a parallel legal system, i suppose it could described as a two tier system, one public and the other private.
The idea that any UK citizen can be forced into court by anonymous entities using front organisations like the CCA, should be of concern to anyone who believes in equality before the law.
below is a link to the transcript. of the Reginald Hunter case.
Anyone can prosecute anyone else, but normally it's left to the CPS. This is what The Post Office were doing when they prosecuted the sub-postmasters.
The quotes in the transcript sound like comedy to me, but it's impossible to tell without the context. I suspect that the statements were made where the subject was already about jews, his point was that the issue was that they were a liar not that they were a jew. If so then it's fine, but I think they're attempting to portray it as him saying that all jews are liars.
The ruling at the end is very blunt and tells them to clear off.
The CAA are playing right into the hands of those who claim that Jews invisibly control the world from behind the scenes with this sort of lawfare.
The quotes in the transcript sound like comedy to me, but it's impossible to tell without the context. I suspect that the statements were made where the subject was already about jews, his point was that the issue was that they were a liar not that they were a jew. If so then it's fine, but I think they're attempting to portray it as him saying that all jews are liars.
The ruling at the end is very blunt and tells them to clear off.
The CAA are playing right into the hands of those who claim that Jews invisibly control the world from behind the scenes with this sort of lawfare.
Exert:
"The all-parliamentary group against anti-Semitism stated, in its 2015 report, that
“it is important that the (CAA) leadership do not conflate concerns about activity
legitimately protesting Israel’s actions with antisemitism, as we have seen has
been the case on some occasions.”
good point.
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 14,164
- Reaction score
- 4,151
- Country
would make?
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2022
- Messages
- 4,786
- Reaction score
- 578
- Country
There are also some people here who would do well to take note of it.
Plus the fact that if you tell people over and over again that "hatred" of Israel is equivalent to hatred of Jews, don't be surprised that eventually you radicalise some people who started out just being opposed to Israel into being full-on Jew-haters.